Undesirable effects of threatening climate change information: A cross-cultural study. (April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Uhl, Isabella; Klackl, Johannes; Hansen, Nina; Jonas, Eva
• Other Names: Pearson Adam R. guest-editor.; Schuldt Jonathon P. guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Group processes and intergroup relations. Volume 21:Number 3(2018)
• Page Start: 513
• Page End: 529
• Publication Date: 2018-04
• Subjects: climate change threat -- cultural differences -- ethnocentrism -- ingroup affirmation -- proenvironmental behavior intention; Intergroup relations -- Periodicals; Social groups -- Periodicals; 302.305
• DOI: 10.1177/1368430217735577
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-4302

Abstract

Why is the fight against climate change so challenging? Research suggests that climate change information may trigger symbolic defense strategies such as derogative outgroup behaviors (e.g., ethnocentrism) instead of direct attempts to address the problem itself (e.g., proenvironmental behavior). Ingroup affirmation may help decrease symbolic responses. We conducted a 2 (Affirmation: ingroup vs. no affirmation) × 2 (Message: threat vs. control) × 2 (Nation: Austria vs. Argentina) experiment ( N = 243) to assess responses to climate change information (direct and symbolic) in participants from individualist and collectivist cultures. Participants responded with higher levels of ethnocentrism and a lower intention to engage in proenvironmental behavior after reading climate change information. This effect was significant in Austria. Using ingroup affirmation as an intervention tended to foster rather than reduce ethnocentrism. Thus, across cultures people resolve climate change threat in symbolic ways rather than by trying to address the problem itself.