More Dose-dependent Side Effects with Mercaptopurine over Azathioprine in IBD Treatment Due to Relatively Higher Dosing. Issue 10 (October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Broekman, Mark M. T. J.; Coenen, Marieke J. H.; van Marrewijk, Corine J.; Wanten, Geert J. A.; Wong, Dennis R.; Verbeek, Andre L. M.; Klungel, Olaf H.; Hooymans, Piet M.; Guchelaar, Henk-Jan; Scheffer, Hans; Derijks, Luc J. J.; de Jong, Dirk J.
• Is Part Of: Inflammatory bowel diseases. Volume 23:Issue 10(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-10
• Subjects: azathioprine -- mercaptopurine -- inflammatory bowel disease -- side effects; Inflammatory bowel diseases -- Periodicals; Colitis, Ulcerative -- Periodicals; Crohn Disease -- Periodicals; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.344
• DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001163
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1078-0998

Abstract

Abstract : Background: There are substantial global differences in the preference for mercaptopurine (MP) or its prodrug azathioprine (AZA) as first-choice thiopurine to treat inflammatory bowel diseases. Studies comparing both agents are scarce. Our aim was to compare AZA and MP in thiopurine-naive patients with inflammatory bowel disease for the frequency of side effects and efficacy. Methods: Post hoc analysis of the "Thiopurine response Optimization by Pharmacogenetic testing in Inflammatory bowel disease Clinics" (TOPIC) trial, in which thiopurine-naive patients with inflammatory bowel disease with an indication for a thiopurine were randomized for a genotype-based dose versus standard of care. For this study, Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to compare AZA and MP for discontinuation rates within 5 months, incidence of hepatotoxicity, leukopenia, and gastrointestinal side effects. Treatment efficacy was compared by logistic regression. Results: Patient characteristics were similar for patients treated with AZA (n = 494, 64.4%) and MP (n = 273, 35.6%), yet patients with MP were relatively higher dosed compared with those on AZA. Discontinuation rates within 5 months were not different, 39.3% (AZA) and 38.1% (MP), HR 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.72–1.17; P = 0.50); however, patients on MP were more often subjected to dose reductions (30% versus 14%, P < 0.01). Higher rates of hepatotoxicity, HR 1.93 (95% confidence interval, 1.35–2.76; P < 0.01) and leukopenia, HR 2.55 (95% confidence interval, 1.51–4.30; P < 0.01) were observed with MP, which annulled in a secondary analysis with adjustment for the higher dose and metabolite levels. Conclusions: Patients treated with MP were relatively higher dosed, which resulted in more dose-dependent side effects and a higher rate of dose reductions. Abstract : Article first published online 20 june 2017.Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.