Correlation of Hallux Rigidus Grade With Motion, VAS Pain, Intraoperative Cartilage Loss, and Treatment Success for First MTP Joint Arthrodesis and Synthetic Cartilage Implant. (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baumhauer, Judith F.; Singh, Dishan; Glazebrook, Mark; Blundell, Chris M.; De Vries, Gwyneth; Le, Ian L. D.; Nielsen, Dominic; Pedersen, M. Elizabeth; Sakellariou, Anthony; Solan, Matthew; Wansbrough, Guy; Younger, Alastair S. E.; Daniels, Timothy R.
• Is Part Of: Foot & ankle international. Volume 38:Number 11(2017:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1175
• Page End: 1182
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: First metatarsophalangeal joint -- hallux rigidus -- hemiarthroplasty -- synthetic cartilage implant -- arthritis -- cheilectomy -- first MTP fusion; Foot -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; 617.585
• DOI: 10.1177/1071100717735289
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1071-1007

Abstract

Background: Grading systems are used to assess severity of any condition and as an aid in guiding treatment. This study examined the relationship of baseline motion, pain, and observed intraoperative cartilage loss with hallux rigidus grade. Methods: A prospective, randomized study examining outcomes of arthrodesis compared to synthetic cartilage implant was performed. Patients underwent preoperative clinical examination, radiographic assessment, hallux rigidus grade assignment, and intraoperative assessment of cartilage loss. Visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain was obtained preoperatively and at 24 months. Correlation was made between active peak dorsiflexion, VAS pain, cartilage loss, and hallux rigidus grade. Fisher's exact test was used to assess grade impact on clinical success ( P < .05). Results: In 202 patients, 59 (29%), 110 (55%), and 33 (16%) were classified as Coughlin grades 2, 3, and 4, respectively. There was no correlation between grade and active peak dorsiflexion (–0.069, P = .327) or VAS pain (–0.078, P = .271). Rank correlations between grade and cartilage loss were significant, but correlations were small. When stratified by grade, composite success rates between the 2 treatments were nearly identical. Conclusions: Irrespective of the grade, positive outcomes were demonstrated for both fusion and synthetic cartilage implant. Clinical symptoms and signs should be used to guide treatment, rather than a grade consisting of radiographic, symptoms, and range of motion factors. Level of Evidence: Level II, randomized clinical trial.