A mobile school-based HCT service – is it youth friendly?. Issue 1 (1st January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lawrence, Estelle; Struthers, Patricia; Van Hove, Geert
• Is Part Of: SAHARA J. Volume 13:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 123
• Page End: 135
• Publication Date: 2016-01-01
• Subjects: HIV/AIDS -- HIV Counselling and Testing -- youth -- students -- school -- youth friendly; VIH/SIDA -- Aide Psychosociale et Test de Dépistage VIH (ADV) -- jeunes -- étudiants -- école -- adapté aux besoins des jeunes; HIV infections -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; AIDS (Disease) -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; HIV infections -- Social aspects -- South Africa -- Periodicals; AIDS (Disease) -- Social aspects -- South Africa -- Periodicals; 362.1969792
• DOI: 10.1080/17290376.2016.1222597
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1729-0376

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Despite an increase in HIV Counselling and Testing (HCT), few young people have been tested. It has been suggested that they do not test because formal health services (where HCT is provided) are often not youth friendly. The World Health Organisation describes a youth-friendly health service (YFHS) as one which is accessible, equitable, acceptable, appropriate, and effective. A mobile school-based model has been implemented by a non-governmental organisation in Cape Town in an attempt to make HCT more youth friendly and accessible to young people. The objective of this study was to explore whether this mobile school-based HCT service is youth friendly. Methods: The study was descriptive, using three qualitative data collection methods: observation of the HCT site at two secondary schools; interviews with six service providers; and direct observation of 21 HCT counselling sessions. Key Results: The mobile school-based HCT service fulfilled some of the criteria for being a YFHS. The service was equitable in that all students, irrespective of race, gender, age, or socio-economic status, were free to use the service. It was accessible in terms of location and cost, but students were not well informed to make decisions about using the service. The service was acceptable in that confidentiality was guaranteed and the service providers were friendly and non-judgemental, but it was not considered acceptable in that there was limited privacy. The service was appropriate in that HCT is recommended as an intervention for decreasing the transmission of HIV, based on evidence and expert opinion; however, in this case, HCT was provided as a stand-alone service rather than part of a full package of services. Moreover, studies have suggested that young people want to know their HIV status. The service was ineffective in that it identified students who are HIV positive; however, these students were not assisted to access care. Conclusion: Providing HCT in the school setting may make HCT more accessible for students, but it needs to be provided in an equitable, accessible, acceptable, and effective way.