Blood Flow Restriction Training After Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Issue 3 (May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tennent, David J.; Hylden, Christina M.; Johnson, Anthony E.; Burns, Travis C.; Wilken, Jason M.; Owens, Johnny G.
• Is Part Of: Clinical journal of sport medicine. Volume 27:Issue 3(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-05
• Subjects: blood flow restriction -- occlusion training -- postoperative rehabilitation; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; 617.1027
• DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000377
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1050-642X

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Quadriceps strength after arthroscopic knee procedures is frequently diminished several years postoperation. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training uses partial venous occlusion while performing submaximal exercise to induce muscle hypertrophy and strength improvements. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BFR as a postoperative therapeutic intervention after knee arthroscopy. Methods: A randomized controlled pilot study comparing physical therapy with and without BFR after knee arthroscopy was conducted. Patients underwent 12 sessions of supervised physical therapy. Subjects followed the same postoperative protocol with the addition of 3 additional BFR exercises. Outcome measures included thigh girth, physical function measures, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR12), and strength testing. Bilateral duplex ultrasonography was used to evaluate for deep venous thrombosis preintervention and postintervention. Results: Seventeen patients completed the study. Significant increases in thigh girth were observed in the BFR group at 6-cm and 16-cm proximal to the patella ( P = 0.0111 and 0.0001). All physical outcome measures significantly improved in the BFR group, and the timed stair ascent improvements were greater than conventional therapy ( P = 0.0281). The VR-12 and KOOS subscales significantly improved in the BFR group, and greater improvement was seen in VR-12 mental component score ( P = 0.0149). The BFR group displayed approximately 2-fold greater improvements in extension and flexion strength compared with conventional therapy (74.59% vs 33.5%, P = 0.034). No adverse events were observed during the study. Conclusions: This study suggests that BFR is an effective intervention after knee arthroscopy. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate the benefits of this intervention in populations with greater initial impairment.