Comparison of Intra-Abdominal Pressure Among 3 Prone Positional Apparatuses After Changing From the Supine to the Prone Position and Applying Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Healthy Euvolemic Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Issue 1 (January 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of Intra-Abdominal Pressure Among 3 Prone Positional Apparatuses After Changing From the Supine to the Prone Position and Applying Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Healthy Euvolemic Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Issue 1 (January 2017)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of Intra-Abdominal Pressure Among 3 Prone Positional Apparatuses After Changing From the Supine to the Prone Position and Applying Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Healthy Euvolemic Patients
- Authors:
- Kim, Eugene
Kim, Hyun-Chang
Lim, Young-Jin
Kim, Chi-Heon
Sohn, Seil
Chung, Chun-Kee
Kim, Hyoung-Jun
Kang, Hyun
Park, Hee-Pyoung - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Positional apparatuses used for the prone position can affect intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). In this study, we compared the IAP after changing to the prone position and applying various positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels among 3 prone positional apparatuses. Methods: A total of 108 healthy euvolemic patients undergoing elective prone spinal surgery were divided into 3 groups based on the positional apparatus used: the Jackson spinal table was used in group J (n=36), the Wilson frame in group W (n=36), and chest rolls in group C (n=36). The IAP was measured 2 minutes after application of 0, 3, 6, and 9 cm H2 O of PEEP. Results: The IAP in the supine position was 6.4±3.0, 5.9±2.8, and 7.1±2.5 mm Hg in groups J, C, and W, respectively. After the supine-to-prone positional change, the IAP in the prone position was significantly lower in group J than in groups C and W (2.7±2.9 vs. 8.9±4.0 and 12.9±4.3 mm Hg, P <0.01). In the prone position, a PEEP of 9 cm H2 O increased the IAP from baseline (zero PEEP) by 1.5±1.3, 1.6±1.3, and 1.7±1.0 mm Hg in groups J, C, and W, respectively. Conclusions: The IAP in the prone position was significantly lower using the Jackson table compared with the Wilson frame and chest rolls. A PEEP up to 9 cm H2 O can be safely used in healthy euvolemic patients undergoing prone spinal surgery without a clinically significant increase in IAP, irrespective of the type of prone positional apparatus.
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology. Volume 29:Issue 1(2017:Jan.)
- Journal:
- Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Issue 1(2017:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0029-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-01
- Subjects:
- intra-abdominal pressure -- prone position -- positive end-expiratory pressure
Anesthesia in neurology -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.96748 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/jnsa/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000257 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0898-4921
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5022.150000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8231.xml