Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design. (February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Scott YH; Flory, James; Relton, Clare
• Is Part Of: Clinical trials. Volume 15:Number 1(2018)
• Page Start: 9
• Page End: 16
• Publication Date: 2018-02
• Subjects: Informed consent -- pragmatic trial -- pragmatic randomized controlled trial -- ethics; 615.5072405
• DOI: 10.1177/1740774517746620
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1740-7745

Abstract

Background: With increasing emphasis on pragmatic trials, new randomized clinical trial designs are being proposed to enhance the "real world" nature of the data generated. We describe one such design, appropriate for unmasked pragmatic clinical trials in which the control arm receives usual care, called "Trials within Cohorts" that is increasingly used in various countries because of its efficiency in recruitment, advantages in reducing subject burden, and ability to better mimic real-world consent processes. Methods: Descriptive, ethical, and US regulatory analysis of the Trials within Cohorts design. Results: Trials within Cohorts design involves, after recruitment into a cohort, randomization of eligible subjects, followed by an asymmetric treatment of the two arms: those selected for the experimental arm provide informed consent for the intervention trial, while the data from the control arm are used based on prior broad permission. Thus, unlike the traditional Zelen post-randomization consent design, the cohort participants are informed about future research within the cohort; however, the extent of this disclosure currently varies among studies. Thus, ethical analysis is provided for two types of situations: when the pre-randomization disclosure and consent regarding the embedded trials are fairly explicit and detailed versus when they consist of only general statements about future data use. These differing ethical situations could have implications for how ethics review committees apply US research rules regarding waivers and alterations of informed consent. Conclusion: Trials within Cohorts is a promising new pragmatic randomized controlled trial design that is being increasingly used in various countries. Although the asymmetric consent procedures for the experimental versus control arm subjects can initially raise ethical concerns, it is ethically superior to previous post-randomization consent designs and can have important advantages over traditional trial designs.