Health, performance and conduct concerns among older doctors: A retrospective cohort study of notifications received by medical regulators in Australia. Issue 2 (April 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Health, performance and conduct concerns among older doctors: A retrospective cohort study of notifications received by medical regulators in Australia. Issue 2 (April 2018)
- Main Title:
- Health, performance and conduct concerns among older doctors: A retrospective cohort study of notifications received by medical regulators in Australia
- Authors:
- Thomas, Laura A
Milligan, Eleanor
Tibble, Holly
Too, Lay S
Studdert, David M
Spittal, Matthew J
Bismark, Marie M - Abstract:
- Objectives: To determine whether 'older doctors' (aged over 65) are at higher risk of notifications to the medical regulator than 'younger doctors' (aged 36–60 years) regarding their health, performance and/or conduct. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: National dataset of 12, 878 notifications lodged with medical regulators in Australia between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2014. Participants: All registered doctors in Australia aged 36–60 and >65 years during the study period. Main outcome measures: Incidence rates of notifications and incidence rate ratios of notifications (older versus younger doctors). Results: Older doctors had higher notification rates (90.9 compared with 66.6 per 1000 practitioner years, p < 0.001). Sex-adjusted incidence rate ratios showed that older doctors had a higher risk of notifications relating to physical illness or cognitive decline (incidence rate ratio = 15.54), inadequate record keeping (incidence rate ratio = 1.98), unlawful use or supply of medications (incidence rate ratio = 2.26), substandard certificates/reports (incidence rate ratio = 2.02), inappropriate prescribing (incidence rate ratio = 1.99), disruptive behaviours (incidence rate ratio = 1.37) and substandard treatment (incidence rate ratio = 1.24). Older doctors had lower notification rates relating to mental illness and substance misuse (incidence rate ratio = 0.58) and for performance issues relating to problems with procedures (incidence rate ratio = 0.61).Objectives: To determine whether 'older doctors' (aged over 65) are at higher risk of notifications to the medical regulator than 'younger doctors' (aged 36–60 years) regarding their health, performance and/or conduct. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: National dataset of 12, 878 notifications lodged with medical regulators in Australia between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2014. Participants: All registered doctors in Australia aged 36–60 and >65 years during the study period. Main outcome measures: Incidence rates of notifications and incidence rate ratios of notifications (older versus younger doctors). Results: Older doctors had higher notification rates (90.9 compared with 66.6 per 1000 practitioner years, p < 0.001). Sex-adjusted incidence rate ratios showed that older doctors had a higher risk of notifications relating to physical illness or cognitive decline (incidence rate ratio = 15.54), inadequate record keeping (incidence rate ratio = 1.98), unlawful use or supply of medications (incidence rate ratio = 2.26), substandard certificates/reports (incidence rate ratio = 2.02), inappropriate prescribing (incidence rate ratio = 1.99), disruptive behaviours (incidence rate ratio = 1.37) and substandard treatment (incidence rate ratio = 1.24). Older doctors had lower notification rates relating to mental illness and substance misuse (incidence rate ratio = 0.58) and for performance issues relating to problems with procedures (incidence rate ratio = 0.61). Conclusions: Older doctors were at higher risk for notifications relating to physical or cognitive impairment, records and reports, prescribing or supply of medicines, disruptive behaviour and treatment. They were at lower risk for notifications about mental illness or substance misuse. Incorporating knowledge of these patterns into regulatory practices, workplace adjustments and continuing education/assessment could enhance patient care. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of patient safety and risk management. Volume 23:Issue 2(2018)
- Journal:
- Journal of patient safety and risk management
- Issue:
- Volume 23:Issue 2(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 23, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 23
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0023-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 54
- Page End:
- 62
- Publication Date:
- 2018-04
- Subjects:
- Doctors at risk -- medical negligence law -- medical regulation -- medico-legal issues -- professional regulation -- risk management
Medical jurisprudence -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
Medical personnel -- Malpractice -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
Risk management -- Great Britain -- Periodicals - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/cri ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/2516043518763181 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2516-0435
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8233.xml