The Effects of LCZ696 in Patients With Hypertension Compared With Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. (September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhao, Yang; Yu, Heng; Zhao, Xu; Ma, Ruixin; Li, Ningyin; Yu, Jing
• Other Names: Przyklenk Karin guest-editor.; Whittaker Peter guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. Volume 22:Number 5(2017:Sep.)
• Page Start: 447
• Page End: 457
• Publication Date: 2017-09
• Subjects: hypertension -- renin–angiotensin system; Cardiovascular pharmacology -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1177/1074248417693379
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1074-2484

Abstract

LCZ696, a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, has been demonstrated to have greater advantages in the treatment of heart failure compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, enalapril, or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). However, studies that compared the efficacy and safety of LCZ696 against valsartan in patients with hypertension are limited. To provide further evidence for the benefits of LCZ696 and to make this assessment, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, andClinicalTrials.gov were searched for RCTs. Twelve studies involving 3816 patients were eligible for inclusion. Seven studies compared LCZ696 with valsartan, and 5 studies compared LCZ696 with olmesartan. LCZ696 showed a significantly greater reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP; mean difference [MD] = −5.43 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −6.36 to −4.49 mm Hg; P < .001), diastolic BP (MD = −2.34 mm Hg; 95% CI: −2.67 to −2.01 mm Hg; P < .001), 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP (MD = −3.57 mm Hg, 95% CI: −4.29 to −2.85 mm Hg; P < .001), and 24-hour ambulatory diastolic BP (MD = −1.32 mm Hg, 95% CI: −1.77 to −0.78 mm Hg; P < .001) from the baseline than ARBs. LCZ696 was more effective in reducing BP (odds ratio [OR] = 5.34; 95% CI: 4.49-6.36; P < .01) and had a higher rate of BP control compared with ARBs (OR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.37-1.69; P < .01). LCZ696 had no difference in the incidence of adverse events (OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.94-1.18; P = .38) or serious adverse events (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.51-1.24; P = .31) compared to ARBs. This meta-analysis revealed that LCZ696 has a greater antihypertensive efficacy and an equal tolerability profile.