An empirical study on the performance evaluation of scientific data sharing platforms in China. Issue 2 (15th June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Si, Li; Li, Yueting; Zhuang, Xiaozhe; Xing, Wenming; Hua, Xiaoqin; Li, Xin; Xin, Juanjuan
• Is Part Of: Library hi tech. Volume 33:Issue 2(2015)
• Page Start: 211
• Page End: 229
• Publication Date: 2015-06-15
• Subjects: Performance measurement -- Data management; Library science -- Technological innovations -- Periodicals; Libraries -- Automation -- Periodicals; Information science -- Periodicals; 025.00285
• DOI: 10.1108/LHT-09-2014-0093
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0737-8831

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to conduct performance evaluation of eight main scientific data sharing platforms in China and find existing problems, thus providing reference for maximizing the value of scientific data and enhancing scientific research efficiency. Design/methodology/approach: – First, the authors built an evaluation indicator system for the performance of scientific data sharing platforms. Next, the analytic hierarchy process was employed to set indicator weights. Then, the authors use experts grading method to give scored for each indicator and calculated the scoring results of the scientific data sharing platform performance evaluation. Finally, an analysis of the results was conducted. Findings: – The performance evaluation of eight platforms is arranged by descending order by the value of F : the Data Sharing Infrastructure of Earth System Science (76.962), the Basic Science Data Sharing Center (76.595), the National Scientific Data Sharing Platform for Population and Health (71.577), the China Earthquake Data Center (66.296), the China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System (65.159), the National Agricultural Scientific Data Sharing Center (55.068), the Chinese Forestry Science Data Center (56.894) and the National Scientific Data Sharing & Service Network on Material Environmental Corrosion (Aging) (52.528). And some existing shortcomings such as the relevant policies and regulation, standards of data description and organization, data availability and the services should be improved. Originality/value: – This paper is mainly discussing about the performance evaluation system covering operation management, data resource, platform function, service efficiency and influence of eight scientific data sharing centers and made comparative analysis. It reflected the reality development of scientific data sharing in China.