Crowdsourcing the curriculum: Information literacy instruction in first-year writing. Issue 2 (3rd June 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Crowdsourcing the curriculum: Information literacy instruction in first-year writing. Issue 2 (3rd June 2014)
- Main Title:
- Crowdsourcing the curriculum
- Authors:
- White-Farnham, Jamie
Caffrey Gardner, Carolyn - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: – The purpose of this article is to describe the rationale, process and results of an integrated curricular intervention for information literacy instruction in a first-year writing program. Design/methodology/approach: – The information literacy coordinator collaborated with writing instructors and the Writing Program Administrator on the initial design of information literacy outcomes. The librarian and instructors created a modular curriculum with multiple lessons and activities aligned to each outcome. The curriculum was housed in the course management system for easy updating and distribution. Finally, instructors taught the embedded information literacy activities for two semesters and measured student improvement through a pre-/post-survey and a rubric-based assessment of students' citation and documentation. Findings: – Students saw significant gains over the course of the semester in their ability to use Boolean operators, identify the purpose of sources and understand citation styles. As a related and valuable measure, writing program assessment results showed an improvement in students' performance in citation and documentation in researched writing assignments after a one-year implementation of the intervention. Writing instructors reported an increased awareness of information literacy pedagogy and intentionality in their teaching. Finally, the librarian was able to leverage this collaboration to highlight the teaching roles of librariansAbstract : Purpose: – The purpose of this article is to describe the rationale, process and results of an integrated curricular intervention for information literacy instruction in a first-year writing program. Design/methodology/approach: – The information literacy coordinator collaborated with writing instructors and the Writing Program Administrator on the initial design of information literacy outcomes. The librarian and instructors created a modular curriculum with multiple lessons and activities aligned to each outcome. The curriculum was housed in the course management system for easy updating and distribution. Finally, instructors taught the embedded information literacy activities for two semesters and measured student improvement through a pre-/post-survey and a rubric-based assessment of students' citation and documentation. Findings: – Students saw significant gains over the course of the semester in their ability to use Boolean operators, identify the purpose of sources and understand citation styles. As a related and valuable measure, writing program assessment results showed an improvement in students' performance in citation and documentation in researched writing assignments after a one-year implementation of the intervention. Writing instructors reported an increased awareness of information literacy pedagogy and intentionality in their teaching. Finally, the librarian was able to leverage this collaboration to highlight the teaching roles of librarians beyond the one-shot. Originality/value: – Well-known temporal and logistical limits exist in regard to embedded, one-shot and multi-shot approaches to information literacy. The latter two are especially unsustainable when implemented at scale, such as within a first-year writing program that serves hundreds or thousands of students each semester. This study documents a faculty development approach in which writing instructors integrate information literacy (IL) into their own instruction. This offers a model that makes explicit IL processes and skills to writing instructors, results in high student performance and allows especially the small college librarian to manage his/her other strategic information literacy partnerships. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Reference services review. Volume 42:Issue 2(2014)
- Journal:
- Reference services review
- Issue:
- Volume 42:Issue 2(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 42, Issue 2 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0042-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 277
- Page End:
- 292
- Publication Date:
- 2014-06-03
- Subjects:
- Collaboration -- Assessment -- Information literacy -- Undergraduates -- Curriculum
Reference books -- Bibliography -- Periodicals
Reference services (Libraries) -- Periodicals
025.52 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0090-7324 ↗
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1108/RSR-09-2013-0046 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0090-7324
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7331.920000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8227.xml