The relationship between covariance risk and size effects in emerging equity markets. Issue 3 (14th March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Ming-Chieh; Ye, Jin-Kui
• Is Part Of: Managerial finance. Volume 42:Issue 3(2016)
• Page Start: 174
• Page End: 190
• Publication Date: 2016-03-14
• Subjects: Financial markets -- International investments -- G12 -- G15; Corporations -- Finance -- Periodicals; Business enterprises -- Finance -- Periodicals; 658.1505
• DOI: 10.1108/MF-10-2014-0269
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0307-4358

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the conditionally expected return on size-based portfolios in an emerging market (EM) is determined by the country's world risk exposure. The authors analyze the degree of financial integration of 23 emerging equity markets grouped into five size portfolios using the conditional international asset pricing model with both world and domestic market risks. The authors also compare the model's fitness on the predictability of portfolio returns by using world and EM indices. Design/methodology/approach: – This study investigates whether large-cap stocks are priced globally and whether mid- and small-cap stocks are strongly influenced by domestic risk factors. The authors first examine the predictability of large-, mid-, and small-cap stock portfolio returns by using global and local variables, and next compare the model fitness by using world and EM indices on the prediction of size-based stock returns. Finally, the authors test whether the world price of covariance risk is the same for different portfolios. Findings: – The authors find that the conditional expected returns of large-cap stocks should be priced by global variables. Mid- and small-cap stocks are influenced by domestic variables rather than global variables, and their returns are priced by local residual risks. The test of the conditional asset pricing model shows that the largest stocks have the smallest mean absolute pricing errors (MAE), and their pricing errors are lower in large markets than in small markets. Third, the EM index offers more predictability for the excess returns of mid- and small-cap stocks than the world market index, but the explanatory power of this index does not increase for large-cap stocks. Originality/value: – EMs in the past were known as segment markets, with local risk factors more important than global risk factors, suggesting significant benefits from adding EMs to global portfolios. It would be interesting to examine whether financial integration differs for various firm sizes in the markets.