How Do Contextual Factors Influence Implementation and Receipt of Positive Youth Development Programs Addressing Substance Use and Violence? A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Process Evaluations. Issue 4 (May 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- How Do Contextual Factors Influence Implementation and Receipt of Positive Youth Development Programs Addressing Substance Use and Violence? A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Process Evaluations. Issue 4 (May 2018)
- Main Title:
- How Do Contextual Factors Influence Implementation and Receipt of Positive Youth Development Programs Addressing Substance Use and Violence? A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Process Evaluations
- Authors:
- Dickson, Kelly
Melendez-Torres, G. J.
Fletcher, Adam
Hinds, Kate
Thomas, James
Stansfield, Claire
Murphy, Simon
Campbell, Rona
Bonell, Chris - Abstract:
- Objective: Positive youth development (PYD) often aims to prevent tobacco, alcohol, and drugs use and violence. We systematically reviewed PYD interventions, synthesizing process, and outcomes evidence. Synthesis of outcomes, published elsewhere, found no overall evidence of reducing substance use or violence but notable variability of fidelity. Our synthesis of process evaluations examined how implementation varied and was influenced by context. Data Source: Process evaluations of PYD aiming to reduce substance use and violence. Study Inclusion Criteria: Overall review published since 1985; written in English; focused on youth aged 11 to 18 years; focused on interventions addressing multiple positive assets; reported on theory, process, or outcomes; and concerned with reducing substance use or violence. Synthesis of process evaluations examined how implementation varies with or is influenced by context. Data Extraction: Two reviewers in parallel. Data Synthesis: Thematic synthesis. Results: We identified 12 reports. Community engagement enhanced program appeal. Collaboration with other agencies could broaden the activities offered. Calm but authoritative staff increased acceptability. Staff continuity underpinned diverse activities and durable relationships. Empowering participants were sometimes in tension with requiring them to engage in diverse activities. Conclusion: Our systematic review identified factors that might help improve the fidelity and acceptability of PYDObjective: Positive youth development (PYD) often aims to prevent tobacco, alcohol, and drugs use and violence. We systematically reviewed PYD interventions, synthesizing process, and outcomes evidence. Synthesis of outcomes, published elsewhere, found no overall evidence of reducing substance use or violence but notable variability of fidelity. Our synthesis of process evaluations examined how implementation varied and was influenced by context. Data Source: Process evaluations of PYD aiming to reduce substance use and violence. Study Inclusion Criteria: Overall review published since 1985; written in English; focused on youth aged 11 to 18 years; focused on interventions addressing multiple positive assets; reported on theory, process, or outcomes; and concerned with reducing substance use or violence. Synthesis of process evaluations examined how implementation varies with or is influenced by context. Data Extraction: Two reviewers in parallel. Data Synthesis: Thematic synthesis. Results: We identified 12 reports. Community engagement enhanced program appeal. Collaboration with other agencies could broaden the activities offered. Calm but authoritative staff increased acceptability. Staff continuity underpinned diverse activities and durable relationships. Empowering participants were sometimes in tension with requiring them to engage in diverse activities. Conclusion: Our systematic review identified factors that might help improve the fidelity and acceptability of PYD interventions. Addressing these might enable PYD to fulfill its potential as a means of promoting health. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of health promotion. Volume 32:Issue 4(2018)
- Journal:
- American journal of health promotion
- Issue:
- Volume 32:Issue 4(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 32, Issue 4 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0032-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 1110
- Page End:
- 1121
- Publication Date:
- 2018-05
- Subjects:
- young people -- positive youth development -- process evaluations systematic review -- qualitative
Health promotion -- Periodicals
Health Promotion
Health promotion
Periodicals
Periodicals
613.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://ahp.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.ajhpcontents.com/ ↗
http://www.healthpromotionjournal.com/ ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0890117116670302 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0890-1171
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8171.xml