Lean and Six Sigma in acute care: a systematic review of reviews. Issue 2 (14th March 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Lean and Six Sigma in acute care: a systematic review of reviews. Issue 2 (14th March 2016)
- Main Title:
- Lean and Six Sigma in acute care: a systematic review of reviews
- Authors:
- Deblois, Simon
Lepanto, Luigi - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of literature reviews, summarizing how Lean and Six Sigma management techniques have been implemented in acute care settings to date, and assessing their impact. To aid decision makers who wish to use these techniques by identifying the sectors of activity most often targeted, the main results of the interventions, as well as barriers and facilitators involved. To identify areas of future research. Design/methodology/approach: – A literature search was conducted, using eight databases. The methodological quality of the selected reviews was appraised with AMSTAR. A narrative synthesis was performed according to the guidelines proposed by Popay et al. (2006). Data were reported according to PRISMA. Findings: – The literature search identified 149 publications published from 1999 to January 2015. Seven literature reviews were included into the systematic review, upon appraisal. The overall quality of the evidence was poor to fair. The clinical settings most described were specialized health care services, including operating suites, intensive care units and emergency departments. The outcomes most often appraised related to processes and quality. The evidence suggests that Lean and Six Sigma are better adapted to settings where processes involve a linear sequence of events. Research limitations/implications: – There is a need for more studies of high methodological quality to better understand theAbstract : Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of literature reviews, summarizing how Lean and Six Sigma management techniques have been implemented in acute care settings to date, and assessing their impact. To aid decision makers who wish to use these techniques by identifying the sectors of activity most often targeted, the main results of the interventions, as well as barriers and facilitators involved. To identify areas of future research. Design/methodology/approach: – A literature search was conducted, using eight databases. The methodological quality of the selected reviews was appraised with AMSTAR. A narrative synthesis was performed according to the guidelines proposed by Popay et al. (2006). Data were reported according to PRISMA. Findings: – The literature search identified 149 publications published from 1999 to January 2015. Seven literature reviews were included into the systematic review, upon appraisal. The overall quality of the evidence was poor to fair. The clinical settings most described were specialized health care services, including operating suites, intensive care units and emergency departments. The outcomes most often appraised related to processes and quality. The evidence suggests that Lean and Six Sigma are better adapted to settings where processes involve a linear sequence of events. Research limitations/implications: – There is a need for more studies of high methodological quality to better understand the effects of these approaches as well as the factors of success and barriers to their implementation. Field studies comparing the effects of Lean and Six Sigma to those of other process redesign or quality improvement efforts would bring a significant contribution to the body of knowledge. Practical implications: – Lean and Six Sigma can be considered valuable process optimization approaches in acute health care settings. The success of their implementation requires significant participation of clinical personnel from the frontline as well as clinical leaders and managers. More research is needed to better understand the factors of success and the barriers to their implementation, as well as their long-term impact. Originality/value: – This is the first broad systematic review of reviews, synthesizing data pertaining to implementation issues and results in acute care settings, to be published. It will benefit health care managers assessing the potential of these approaches and the potential drawbacks associated with their implementation. Moreover, it identifies directions for future research. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of health care quality assurance. Volume 29:Issue 2(2016)
- Journal:
- International journal of health care quality assurance
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Issue 2(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0029-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 192
- Page End:
- 208
- Publication Date:
- 2016-03-14
- Subjects:
- Six Sigma -- Lean thinking -- Quality management -- Literature review -- Process efficiency -- Acute care settings
Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals
362.1068 - Journal URLs:
- http://info.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=ijhcqa ↗
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2014-0058 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0952-6862
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.275000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8152.xml