Public health agencies' obligations and the case of Zika. (13th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Luna, Florencia
• Other Names: Dawson Angus guestEditor.; Ballantyne Angela guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Bioethics. Volume 31:Number 8(2017:Oct.)
• Page Start: 575
• Page End: 581
• Publication Date: 2017-09-13
• Subjects: abortion -- international public health agencies -- public health -- local public health agencies -- sexual and reproductive health -- sexual and reproductive rights -- Zika; Bioethics -- Periodicals; 174.957
• DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12388
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-9702

Abstract

Abstract: This article focuses on the initial reactions to the Zika epidemic by national and international public health agencies. It presents and analyzes some responses public officials made about sexual and reproductive health at the inception of the epidemic. It also describes the different challenges and obligations faced by local and international public health agencies, as these have not been clearly outlined. The article argues that these agencies have different obligations and should fulfill them despite existing obstacles. While international agencies should honor their leadership role and make recommendations at a meta‐level, local agencies should provide, in the case of Zika, a framework for empowerment and grant women the freedom to achieve sexual and reproductive health so that they can avoid the consequences of this epidemic.