Are long tide gauge records in the wrong place to measure global mean sea level rise?. Issue 19 (9th October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thompson, P. R.; Hamlington, B. D.; Landerer, F. W.; Adhikari, S.
• Is Part Of: Geophysical research letters. Volume 43:Issue 19(2016)
• Page Start: 10, 403
• Page End: 10, 411
• Publication Date: 2016-10-09
• Subjects: global mean sea level -- tide gauges; Geophysics -- Periodicals; Planets -- Periodicals; Lunar geology -- Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1002/2016GL070552
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-8276

Abstract

Abstract: Ocean dynamics, land motion, and changes in Earth's gravitational and rotational fields cause local sea level change to deviate from the rate of global mean sea level rise. Here we use observations and simulations of spatial structure in sea level change to estimate the likelihood that these processes cause sea level trends in the longest and highest‐quality tide gauge records to be systematically biased relative to the true global mean rate. The analyzed records have an average twentieth century rate of approximately 1.6 mm/yr, but based on the locations of these gauges, we show that the simple average underestimates the twentieth century global mean rate by 0.1 ± 0.2 mm/yr. Given the distribution of potential sampling biases, we find that <1% probability that observed trends from the longest and highest‐quality tide gauge records are consistent with global mean rates less than 1.4 mm/yr. Key Points: Averaging trends from a few high‐quality tide gauge records can lead to systematic underestimate or overestimate of global mean sea level rise The best tide gauge records tend to sample the ocean where twentieth century sea level rise was most likely less than the global mean rate Global mean rates less than 1.4 mm/yr are difficult to reconcile with observed trends in the longest and highest‐quality tide gauge records