Fair value in financial statements after financial crisis. Issue 3 (9th November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Majercakova, Daniela; Skoda, Miroslav
• Editors: Othmar M. Lehner, Professor
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied accounting research. Volume 16:Issue 3(2015)
• Page Start: 312
• Page End: 332
• Publication Date: 2015-11-09
• Subjects: IFRS -- Value relevance -- Reliability -- Financial accounting -- Dual reporting system; Accounting -- Periodicals; Accounting -- Research -- Periodicals; 657.072
• DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-07-2014-0069
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0967-5426

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to examine and depict the advantages and disadvantages connected to the fair value, providing the reader with objective information and thorough insight into the problems and benefits of fair value. Partial objectives of this paper are to define the concept of fair value, to provide information about theoretical background and evolution of fair value and to examine and describe the possible future development of fair value. Design/methodology/approach: – Findings in the paper are based on study of existing literature and also on study using the open-ended approach of grounded theory, including 50 interviews and two group discussions with professional accountants dealing with the fair value accounting in practice. Findings: – According to the advantages and disadvantages of the concept of fair value in accounting, it is quite obvious and clear that this concept is far from being perfect. It is very difficult to determine whether its contribution to the improvement of accounting is really beneficial. Although the fair-value discussion seems to be far from over now, the current crisis provided an interesting setting to further explore these issues, understand them better and hopefully urge responsible institutions to fix the imperfections within the system to make it work correctly and more effectively. Research limitations/implications: – Because of the chosen research approach, the research results may lack generalisability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test the proposed propositions further. Practical implications: – This paper highlights that historical cost and fair value accounting must not be considered as competitors, as they serve different purposes. Knowledge of fair value is important, although it is not enough. Users also need to know the cost of the investment. In fact, knowing how much resources have been sacrificed to obtain that fair value, they could effectively evaluate stewardship. As a consequence, the adoption of a dual measurement and reporting system should be considered and discussed at a standard setting level. Originality/value: – This paper fulfils an identified need to study how fair value accounting can be useful in the future.