Comparing usage between a Dynamic and a Static e-monograph Collection. Issue 1 (5th January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lamothe, Alain R
• Is Part Of: Collection building. Volume 34:Issue 1(2015)
• Page Start: 17
• Page End: 26
• Publication Date: 2015-01-05
• Subjects: E-books -- Collection development -- Academic libraries -- Collection size -- E-monographs -- Usage statistics; Collection development (Libraries) -- Periodicals; 025.21
• DOI: 10.1108/CB-10-2014-0047
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-4953

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to present the results from a quantitative analysis comparing usage levels between an e-monograph collection that has experienced continual growth and an e-monograph collection that has not experienced any recent growth whatsoever. The aim of the study was to determine quantitatively if e-monograph collections with dynamic content experience greater levels of usage compared to e-monograph collections that are static in both size and content. Design/methodology/approach: – E-monograph data were separated into a Dynamic and a Static Collection. Usage for e-monographs belonging to the Dynamic Collection was compared to usage of e-monographs belonging to the Static Collection. The number of e-monographs was obtained by simple count. Additional statistics tracked include the number of viewings. A linear regression analysis was used to determine the strength of the linear relationship between collection size and usage. Findings: – Results indicate that e-monograph collections that continue to grow in both size and content also continue to experience year-to-year increases in usage, whereas e-monograph collections that remain static in size and content experience a decline in usage. A linear regression analysis indicates the existence of a very strong linear relationship that exists between Dynamic Collection size and usage. A weaker linear relationship was calculated for Static Collection size and usage. Originality/value: – This research is one of very few studies systematically and quantitatively comparing usage levels between e-monographs from growing collections to collections that have not had any new titles added recently.