Placing the distant other on the shelf: An analysis and comparison of (fair trade) coffee packages in relation to commodity fetishism. (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Geysmans, Robbe; Hustinx, Lesley
• Is Part Of: Sociological research online. Volume 21:Number 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 15
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: Fair Trade -- Commodity Fetishism -- Mainstreaming -- Marketing -- Ethical Consumption; Sociology -- Periodicals; Sociology -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Sociology -- Research -- Periodicals; 301
• DOI: 10.5153/sro.3854
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1360-7804

Abstract

Fair trade has been praised for 'de-fetishizing' commodities by providing consumers with information on the production of the commodity. Various empirical studies of fair trade marketing materials have generated critique of this vision. However, these focused on materials produced by engaged fair trade organizations. As the fair trade concept has entered the mainstream, fair trade products have found their way into supermarkets. In this setting, these products are confronted with competition, both internal (with other fair trade products) and external (with non-fair trade products). In this article, we argue for a broader focus when studying the relationship between fair trade and defetishization. Our argument is based on a study of whether and how defetishization is advanced on packages of ground coffee within the retail landscape of Flanders, Belgium. Several categories of packages can be distinguished, based on brand (e.g., fair trade advocate, regular brand, retailer house brand) and label (e.g. fair trade label; other social label; no label, but origin is emphasized in the product name). We demonstrate the difficulty of distinguishing these packages based on the visual and textual information they carry (beyond the label), which complicates the identification of any clearly distinct 'fair trade message' on these packages. Instead of serving a clear 'defetishizing' function, these messages are mixed, interchanged, and adapted. We argue that this could be a direct consequence of perceived or actual changes in the consumer publics inherent to the mainstreaming of fair trade.