Crowdsourcing and regulatory reviews: A new way of challenging red tape in British government?. Issue 1 (12th February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lodge, Martin; Wegrich, Kai
• Is Part Of: Regulation & governance. Volume 9:Issue 1(2015:Mar.)
• Page Start: 30
• Page End: 46
• Publication Date: 2014-02-12
• Subjects: consultation -- crowdsourcing -- red tape -- regulatory review -- UK government; Delegated legislation -- Periodicals; Corporate governance -- Periodicals; 320.05
• DOI: 10.1111/rego.12048
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-5983

Abstract

Abstract: Much has been said about the appeal of digital government devices to enhance consultation on rulemaking. This paper explores the most ambitious attempt by the UK central government so far to draw on "crowdsourcing" to consult and act on regulatory reform, the "Red Tape Challenge." We find that the results of this exercise do not represent any major change to traditional challenges to consultation processes. Instead, we suggest that the extensive institutional arrangements for crowdsourcing were hardly significant in informing actual policy responses: neither the tone of the crowdsourced comments, the direction of the majority views, nor specific comments were seen to matter. Instead, it was processes within the executive that shaped the overall governmental responses to this initiative. The findings, therefore, provoke wider debates about the use of social media in rulemaking and consultation exercises.