Genetic risk score and cardiovascular mortality in a southern european population with coronary artery disease. Issue 6 (15th May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pereira, Andreia; Mendonca, Maria Isabel; Sousa, Ana Célia; Borges, Sofia; Freitas, Sónia; Henriques, Eva; Rodrigues, Mariana; Freitas, Ana Isabel; Guerra, Graça; Ornelas, Ilídio; Pereira, Décio; Brehm, António; Palma Dos Reis, Roberto
• Is Part Of: International journal of clinical practice. Volume 71:Issue 6(2017)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-05-15
• Subjects: Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12956
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-5031

Abstract

Abstract : Summary: Several genetic risk scores (GRS) have been associated with cardiovascular disease; their role, however, in survival from proven coronary artery disease (CAD) have yielded conflicting results. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate long‐term cardiovascular mortality according to the genetic risk score in a Southern European population with CAD. Methods: A cohort of 1464 CAD patients with angiographic proven CAD were followed up prospectively for up to 58.3 (interquartile range: 25.8‐88.1) months. Genotyping of 32 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms previously associated with CAD was performed using oligonucleotides probes marked with fluorescence for each allele. GRS was constructed according to the additive model assuming codominance and categorised using the median (=26). Cox Regression analysis was performed to determine independent multivariate predictors of cardiovascular mortality. Kaplan‐Meier survival curves compared high vs low GRS using log‐rank test. C‐index was done for our population, as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis model. Results: During a mean follow‐up of 58.3 months, 156 patients (10.7%) died, 107 (7.3%) of CV causes. High GRS (≥26) was associated with reduced cardiovascular survival. Survival analysis with Cox regression model adjusted for 8 variables showed that high GRS, dyslipidemia, diabetes and 3‐vessel disease were independent risk factors for cardiovascular mortality (HR=1.53, P =.037; HR=3.64, P =.012; HR=1.75, P =.004; HR=2.97, P <.0001, respectively). At the end of follow‐up, the estimated survival probability was 70.8% for high GRS and 80.8% for low GRS (Log‐rank test 5.6; P =.018). C‐Index of 0.71 was found when GRS was added to a multivariate survival model of diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, hypertension and 3 vessel disease, stable angina and dual antiplatelet therapy. Conclusions: Besides the classical risk factors management, this work highlights the relevance of the genetic profile in survival from CAD. It is expected that new therapies will be dirsected to gene targets with proven value in cardiovascular survival.