Effectiveness of a newly designed construction uniform for heat strain attenuation in a hot and humid environment. (January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yi, Wen; Chan, Albert P.C.; Wong, Francis K.W.; Wong, Del P.
• Is Part Of: Applied ergonomics. Volume 58(2016)
• Page Start: 555
• Page End: 565
• Publication Date: 2017-01
• Subjects: Construction uniform -- Heat strain -- Moisture management textile; Human engineering -- Periodicals; 620.82
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.04.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-6870

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly designed construction uniform in combating heat stress. Ten male volunteers performed treadmill running in a climatic chamber maintained at 34.5 °C temperature, 75% relative humidity, 0.3 m/s air velocity, and solar radiation of 450 W/m 2 that simulates typical summer working environment of construction sites in Hong Kong. The participants were tested while wearing two kinds of construction uniforms: a commonly worn uniform A, or a newly designed uniform B. It was found during exercise that Tc (38.34 ± 0.14 vs 38.45 ± 0.11 °C, p = 0.03), Tsk (36.01 ± 0.36 vs 36.27 ± 0.34 °C, p = 0.03), HR (162.7 ± 10.1 vs 172.5 ± 9.2 bpm, p < 0.01), PSI (7.0 ± 0.4 vs 7.5 ± 0.5, p = 0.04), thermal sensation (1.7 ± 0.9 vs 2.6 ± 0.7, p = 0.02), and wetness sensation (1.9 ± 0.9 vs 2.6 ± 0.8, p < 0.01) was lower when wearing uniform B than that of uniform A. It was found during recovery that Tc (37.89 ± 0.13 vs 38.06 ± 0.13 °C, p < 0.01), Tsk (35.68 ± 0.37 vs 36.02 ± 0.41 °C, p < 0.01), HR (104.2 ± 10.1 vs 112.6 ± 10.7 bpm, p < 0.01), PSI (3.3 ± 0.7 vs 4.1 ± 1.0, p < 0.01), thermal sensation (0.1 ± 0.9 vs 1.0 ± 0.8, p = 0.02), and wetness sensation (1.1 ± 1.0 vs 2.3 ± 0.8, p = 0.02) was lower when wearing uniform B than that of uniform A. The findings of this study suggested the newly designed construction uniform could reduce thermoregulatory and cardiovascular strain, and improve thermal comfort while exercising in a hot and humid environment. Highlights: A climatic chamber was set at 31.5 °C wet bulb globe temperature. Ten male volunteers were tested while wearing two kinds of construction uniforms A&B. Physiological and psychobiological responses were monitored throughout the test. Participants wearing uniform B suffered less heat strain than that of uniform A.