Using temporal orientation, category fluency, and word recall for detecting cognitive impairment: the 10‐point cognitive screener (10‐CS). (16th March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Apolinario, Daniel; Lichtenthaler, Daniel Gomes; Magaldi, Regina Miksian; Soares, Aline Thomaz; Busse, Alexandre Leopold; das Gracas Amaral, Jose Renato; Jacob‐Filho, Wilson; Brucki, Sonia Maria Dozzi
• Is Part Of: International journal of geriatric psychiatry. Volume 31:Number 1(2016)
• Page Start: 4
• Page End: 12
• Publication Date: 2015-03-16
• Subjects: orientation -- memory -- verbal fluency -- dementia -- mild cognitive impairment -- screening; Geriatric psychiatry -- Periodicals; Geriatric Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 618.97689
• DOI: 10.1002/gps.4282
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0885-6230

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: A screening strategy composed of three‐item temporal orientation and three‐word recall has been increasingly used for detecting cognitive impairment. However, the intervening task administered between presentation and recall has varied. We evaluated six brief tasks that could be useful as intervening distractors and possibly provide incremental accuracy: serial subtraction, clock drawing, category fluency, letter fluency, timed visual detection, and digits backwards. Methods: Older adults ( n = 230) consecutively referred for suspected cognitive impairment underwent a comprehensive assessment for gold‐standard diagnosis, of whom 56 (24%) presented cognitive impairment not dementia and 68 (30%) presented dementia. Among those with dementia, 87% presented very mild or mild stages (Clinical Dementia Rating 0.5 or 1). The incremental value of each candidate intervening task in a model already containing orientation and word recall was assessed. Results: Category fluency (animal naming) presented the highest incremental value among the six candidate intervening tasks. Reclassification analyses revealed a net gain of 12% among cognitively impaired and 17% among normal participants. A four‐point scaled score of the animal naming task was added to three‐item temporal orientation and three‐word recall to compose the 10‐point Cognitive Screener. The education‐adjusted 10‐point Cognitive Screener outperformed the longer Mini‐Mental State Examination for detecting both cognitive impairment (area under the curve 0.85 vs 0.77; p = 0.027) and dementia (area under the curve 0.90 vs 0.83; p = 0.015). Conclusions: Based on empirical data, we have developed a brief and easy‐to‐use screening strategy with higher accuracy and some practical advantages compared with commonly used tools. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.