Diagnosis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement in cytological samples through a fluorescence in situ hybridization–based assay: Cytological smears versus cell blocks. Issue 5 (14th February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zito Marino, Federica; Rossi, Giulio; Brunelli, Matteo; Malzone, Maria Gabriella; Liguori, Giuseppina; Bogina, Giuseppe; Morabito, Alessandro; Rocco, Gaetano; Franco, Renato; Botti, Gerardo
• Is Part Of: Cancer cytopathology. Volume 125:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: 303
• Page End: 312
• Publication Date: 2017-02-14
• Subjects: anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) -- cell block -- cytological smears -- fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) -- lung cytology; Cancer -- Cytopathology -- Periodicals; Pathology, Cellular -- Periodicals; Cytology -- Technique -- Periodicals; 611.01815
• DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21835
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1934-662X

Abstract

Abstract : Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) status analysis of lung cytological specimens should be successfully encouraged in routine practice because biopsy specimens are not always available. To date, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved both fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as diagnostic tests for identifying ALK‐positive patients eligible for treatment with crizotinib. Although ALK IHC is an optimal diagnostic tool, FISH becomes mandatory in equivocal cases. ALK FISH of paraffin‐embedded tissue material is still the gold standard, whereas the cytological specimen assay has not yet been completely standardized. Many controversial data have been reported on the adequacy of cytology cell blocks (CBs) versus conventional smears for FISH testing. This review discusses some critical issues related to ALK FISH of cytological samples, including the triaging of collected specimens to optimize the material, the use of CBs versus conventional smears, and alternative methods for an ALK rearrangement diagnosis. Conventional smears have the advantages of an immediate evaluation, no probe tissue‐related artifactual loss, no fixation‐related alterations, and usually sufficient material for an analytic preparation. On the other hand, CBs have several advantages, including the appropriate conservation of the tissue architecture, an absence of problems related to cell overlapping, and the ability to evaluate neoplastic cells in a dark field. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:303–312. © 2017 American Cancer Society. Abstract : The adequacy of lung cytological samples is a hot issue for anaplastic lymphoma kinase fluorescence in situ hybridization assays. The optimal triage of lung cytological samples is essential.