Social Ontology and Varieties of Interpretation: A Hermeneutic Critique of Searle. Issue 2 (March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kögler, Hans-Herbert
• Other Names: Henderson David guest-editor.; Risjord Mark guest-editor.; Roth Paul A. guest-editor.; Schabas Margaret guest-editor.; Steel Dan guest-editor.; Turner Stephen guest-editor.; Wylie Alison guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Philosophy of the social sciences. Volume 48:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 192
• Page End: 217
• Publication Date: 2018-03
• Subjects: interpretation -- intentionality -- methodological pluralism -- hermeneutics -- Bohman; Social sciences -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Sciences sociales -- Périodiques; Sciences sociales -- Méthodologie -- Périodiques; 300.1
• DOI: 10.1177/0048393117742336
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0048-3931

Abstract

The essay probes the limits of social ontology as a grounding project for interpretation and explanation in the social sciences. The argument proceeds by challenging the exemplary and influential ontology of John Searle by means of Jim Bohman's hermeneutic approach. While both share the interest in establishing the validity basis of social-scientific claims, Bohman reconstructs in this regard the situated standpoint of the hermeneutic interpreter, in contrast to Searle's building block approach to social reality. A careful analysis of Bohman's argumentation reveals the need for differentiating a variety of interpretive stances, which leads back to important revisions of the intentionality-based social ontology of Searle. The discussion results in the need to ground methodological pluralism in a universal hermeneutics of interpretive capabilities to safeguard the social sciences against relativistic as well as metaphysical challenges.