Comparative Evaluation of the Ostium After External and Nonendoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Using Image Processing (Matlabs and Image J) Softwares. Issue 5 (September 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative Evaluation of the Ostium After External and Nonendoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Using Image Processing (Matlabs and Image J) Softwares. Issue 5 (September 2017)
- Main Title:
- Comparative Evaluation of the Ostium After External and Nonendoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Using Image Processing (Matlabs and Image J) Softwares
- Authors:
- Ganguly, Anasua
Kaza, Hrishikesh
Kapoor, Aditya
Sheth, Jenil
Ali, Mohammad Hasnat
Tripathy, Devjyoti
Rath, Suryasnata - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of the ostium after external dacryocystorhinostomy and nonendoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (NEN-DCR). Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients who underwent a successful external dacryocystorhinostomy or NEN-DCR and had ≥1 month follow up. Pictures of the ostium were captured with a nasal endoscope (4 mm, 30°) after inserting a lacrimal probe premarked at 2 mm. Image analyses were performed using Image J and Contour softwares. Results: Of the 113 patients included, external dacryocystorhinostomy group had 53 patients and NEN-DCR group had 60 patients. The mean age of patients in the NEN-DCR group (38 years) was significantly ( p < 0.05) lower than the external dacryocystorhinostomy group (50 years). There was no statistically significant difference (2 sample t test, p > 0.05) in mean follow up (6 vs. 4 months), maximum diameter of ostium (8 vs. 7 mm), perpendicular drawn to it (4 vs. 4 mm), area of ostium (43 vs. 36 mm 2 ), and the minimum distance between common internal punctum and edge of the ostium (1 vs. 1 mm) between the external and NEN-DCR groups. Conclusions: Image processing softwares offer simple and objective method to measure the ostium. While ostia are comparable in size, their relative position differs with posteriorly placed ostia in external compared with inferior in NEN-DCR. Abstract : Image processing software-based comparison found size of healed ostiaAbstract : Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of the ostium after external dacryocystorhinostomy and nonendoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (NEN-DCR). Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients who underwent a successful external dacryocystorhinostomy or NEN-DCR and had ≥1 month follow up. Pictures of the ostium were captured with a nasal endoscope (4 mm, 30°) after inserting a lacrimal probe premarked at 2 mm. Image analyses were performed using Image J and Contour softwares. Results: Of the 113 patients included, external dacryocystorhinostomy group had 53 patients and NEN-DCR group had 60 patients. The mean age of patients in the NEN-DCR group (38 years) was significantly ( p < 0.05) lower than the external dacryocystorhinostomy group (50 years). There was no statistically significant difference (2 sample t test, p > 0.05) in mean follow up (6 vs. 4 months), maximum diameter of ostium (8 vs. 7 mm), perpendicular drawn to it (4 vs. 4 mm), area of ostium (43 vs. 36 mm 2 ), and the minimum distance between common internal punctum and edge of the ostium (1 vs. 1 mm) between the external and NEN-DCR groups. Conclusions: Image processing softwares offer simple and objective method to measure the ostium. While ostia are comparable in size, their relative position differs with posteriorly placed ostia in external compared with inferior in NEN-DCR. Abstract : Image processing software-based comparison found size of healed ostia to be comparable but the relative position on the lateral nasal wall was posterior in external versus inferior in nonendoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 33:Issue 5(2017)
- Journal:
- Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 33:Issue 5(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 5 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0033-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-09
- Subjects:
- Eye -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Ophthalmic plastic surgery -- Periodicals
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Ophthalmology -- Periodicals
Surgery -- Periodicals
617.70592 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00002341-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.op-rs.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000786 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0740-9303
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6271.430000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8063.xml