How to emerge from the conservatism in clinical research methodology?. Issue 5 (September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kotecki, Nuria; Penel, Nicolas; Awada, Ahmad
• Is Part Of: Current opinion in oncology. Volume 29:Issue 5(2017:Sep.)
• Publication Date: 2017-09
• Subjects: innovative approach -- network -- new drugs -- solid tumors -- unmet need; Oncology -- Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000399
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1040-8746

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose of review: Despite recent changes in clinical research methodology, many challenges remain in drug development methodology. Recent findings: Advances in molecular biology and cancer treatments have changed the clinical research landscape. Thus, we moved from empirical clinical oncology to molecular and immunological therapeutic approaches. Along with this move, adapted dose-limiting toxicities definitions, endpoints, and dose escalation methods have been proposed. Moreover, the classical frontier between phase I, phase II, and phase III has become unclear in particular for immunological approaches. So, investigators are facing major challenges in drug development methodology. Summary: We propose to individualize clinical research using innovative approaches to significantly improve patient outcomes and targeting what is considered unmet need. Integrating high level of translational research and performing well designed biomarker studies with great potential for clinical practice are of utmost importance. This could be performed within new models of clinical research networks and by building a strong collaboration between academic, cooperative groups, on-site investigators, and pharma.