Efavirenz decreases etonogestrel exposure: a pharmacokinetic evaluation of implantable contraception with antiretroviral therapy. (10th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chappell, Catherine A.; Lamorde, Mohammed; Nakalema, Shadia; Chen, Beatrice A.; Mackline, Hope; Riddler, Sharon A.; Cohn, Susan E.; Darin, Kristin M.; Achilles, Sharon L.; Scarsi, Kimberly K.
• Is Part Of: AIDS. Volume 31:Number 14(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-09-10
• Subjects: antiretroviral therapy -- contraceptive implant -- drug–drug interaction -- efavirenz -- etonogestrel -- family planning -- nevirapine; AIDS (Disease) -- Periodicals; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; AIDS (Disease); Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.9792005
• DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001591
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-9370

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel (ENG) released from a contraceptive implant in Ugandan women living with HIV who were receiving efavirenz (EFV) or nevirapine (NVP)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), compared with ART-naive women over 24 weeks. Design: Nonrandomized, parallel-group study with three arms: ART-naive, NVP, or EFV-based ART ( N = 20/group). Methods: Sparse pharmacokinetic sampling of ENG, NVP, or EFV were performed at screening, entry, and then 1, 4, 12, and 24-week postimplant insertion. The primary endpoint was ENG concentrations at week 24, compared between the ART-naive group and each ART group, using geometric mean ratio (GMR) with 90% confidence intervals. Results: Sixty participants competed the 24-week study and data from 58 participants are included; one participant each was excluded from the NVP group and EFV group because of a sample processing error and ART nonadherence, respectively. At week 24, geometric mean ENG was 362, 341, and 66 pg/ml in the ART-naive, NVP, and EFV groups, respectively [GMR: NVP : ART-naive 0.94 (0.90–1.01); EFV : ART-naive 0.18 (0.17–0.20)]. NVP and EFV concentrations were lower at week 24 compared to preimplant [NVP: geometric mean 5.7 versus 6.8 mg/l, respectively, GMR 0.84 (0.83–0.85); EFV: geometric mean 3.6 versus 4.9 mg/l, respectively, GMR 0.73 (0.69–0.80)]. Conclusion: After 24 weeks of combined use, ENG exposure was 82% lower in women using EFV-based ART compared with ART-naive women. In contrast, NVP did not significantly impact ENG exposure. These results raise concerns about reduced effectiveness of implantable contraception for women taking EFV-based ART. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text