One taxon does not fit all: Herb-layer diversity and stand structural complexity are weak predictors of biodiversity in Fagus sylvatica forests. (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sabatini, F.M.; Burrascano, S.; Azzella, M.M.; Barbati, A.; De Paulis, S.; Di Santo, D.; Facioni, L.; Giuliarelli, D.; Lombardi, F.; Maggi, O.; Mattioli, W.; Parisi, F.; Persiani, A.; Ravera, S.; Blasi, C.
• Is Part Of: Ecological indicators. Volume 69(2016)
• Page Start: 126
• Page End: 137
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: Apennines -- Cross-taxon -- Complementarity -- European beech forests -- Habitat-based surrogates -- Species-based surrogates; Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environmental impact analysis -- Periodicals; Environmental risk assessment -- Periodicals; Sustainable development -- Periodicals; 333.71405
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1470-160X

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: Two surrogates are used for predicting stand biodiversity in European beech forests. Target taxa are beetles, saproxylic and epigeous fungi, birds and epiphytic lichens. Herb-layer plants and stand structural complexity were compared as indicators. Herb-layer plants performed better but both surrogates received limited support. Conservation decisions should not rely on surrogates but on multi-taxonomic data. Abstract: Since adequate information on the distribution of biodiversity is hardly achievable, biodiversity indicators are necessary to support the management of ecosystems. These surrogates assume that either some habitat features, or the biodiversity patterns observed in a well-known taxon, can be used as a proxy of the diversity of one or more target taxa. Nevertheless, at least for certain taxa, the validity of this assumption has not yet been sufficiently demonstrated. We investigated the effectiveness of both a habitat- and a taxa-based surrogate in six European beech forests in the Apennines. Particularly, we tested: (1) whether the stand structural complexity and the herb-layer species richness were good predictors of the fine-scale patterns of species richness of five groups of forest-dwelling organisms (beetles, saproxylic and epigeous fungi, birds and epiphytic lichens); and (2) the cross-taxon congruence in species complementarity and composition between herb-layer plants and the target taxa. We used Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs), accumulation curves and Procrustes analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of these surrogates when species richness, complementarity and composition were considered, respectively. Our results provided a limited support to the hypothesis that the herb-layer plants and the stand structural complexity were good surrogates of the target taxa. Although the richness of the herb-layer plants received a stronger support from the data than structural complexity as a predictor for the general patterns of species richness, the overall magnitude of this effect was weak and distinct taxa responded differently. For instance, for increasing levels of herb-layer richness, the richness of lichens showed a marked increase, while the richness of saproxylic fungi decreased. We also found significantly similar complementarity patterns between the herb-layer plants and beetles, as well as a significant congruence in species composition between herb-layer plants and saproxylic fungi. Finally, when different stand structural attributes were considered singularly, only the total amount of deadwood received support from the data as a predictor of the overall species richness. At the fine scale of this study, herb-layer plants and stand structural complexity did not prove to be effective surrogates of multi-taxon biodiversity in well-preserved southern European beech forests. Rather than on weak surrogates, these results suggest that sound conservation decisions should be supported by the information provided by comprehensive multi-taxonomic assessments of forest biodiversity.