Clinical calculators in hospital medicine: Availability, classification, and needs. Issue 133 (September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dziadzko, Mikhail A.; Gajic, Ognjen; Pickering, Brian W.; Herasevich, Vitaly
• Is Part Of: Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. Issue 133(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 6
• Publication Date: 2016-09
• Subjects: Clinical calculator -- Medical calculator -- Clinical score -- Decision support tool -- Electronic medical record; Medicine -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Biology -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Computers -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Logiciels -- Périodiques; Biologie -- Logiciels -- Périodiques; Biology -- Computer programs; Medicine -- Computer programs; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.05.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0169-2607

Abstract

Highlights: Validated clinical calculators and scores serve as useful clinical tools in practice. There is no information about quantity, their distribution by clinical specialties, and their need. Readily available clinical calculators were identified, classified and attributed to clinical specialties. Institution-specific usefulness of clinical calculators was evaluated. Abstract: Objective: Clinical calculators are widely used in modern clinical practice, but are not generally applied to electronic health record (EHR) systems. Important barriers to the application of these clinical calculators into existing EHR systems include the need for real-time calculation, human–calculator interaction, and data source requirements. The objective of this study was to identify, classify, and evaluate the use of available clinical calculators for clinicians in the hospital setting. Methods: Dedicated online resources with medical calculators and providers of aggregated medical information were queried for readily available clinical calculators. Calculators were mapped by clinical categories, mechanism of calculation, and the goal of calculation. Online statistics from selected Internet resources and clinician opinion were used to assess the use of clinical calculators. Results: One hundred seventy-six readily available calculators in 4 categories, 6 primary specialties, and 40 subspecialties were identified. The goals of calculation included prediction, severity, risk estimation, diagnostic, and decision-making aid. A combination of summation logic with cutoffs or rules was the most frequent mechanism of computation. Combined results, online resources, statistics, and clinician opinion identified 13 most utilized calculators. Conclusion: Although not an exhaustive list, a total of 176 validated calculators were identified, classified, and evaluated for usefulness. Most of these calculators are used for adult patients in the critical care or internal medicine settings. Thirteen of 176 clinical calculators were determined to be useful in our institution. All of these calculators have an interface for manual input.