The Cricoid Force Necessary to Occlude the Esophageal Entrance: Is There a Gender Difference?. (April 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Cricoid Force Necessary to Occlude the Esophageal Entrance: Is There a Gender Difference?. (April 2017)
- Main Title:
- The Cricoid Force Necessary to Occlude the Esophageal Entrance
- Authors:
- Zeidan, Ahed M.
Salem, M. Ramez
Bamadhaj, Munir
Mazoit, Jean-Xavier
Sadek, Hussein
Houjairy, Hassan
Abdulkhaleq, Kamal
Bamadhaj, Nabil - Abstract:
- Abstract : BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis whether gender differences exist in the applied cricoid force necessary to prevent regurgitation. Real-time visual and dynamic means were used to assess the effectiveness of different applied cricoid forces in occluding the esophageal entrance in men (group 1) and in women (group 2). METHODS: In anesthetized and paralyzed patients, the glottis and esophageal entrance were visualized with a Glidescope video laryngoscope. Trained operators performed cricoid pressure (CP) and gastric tube insertion trials. Successful gastric tube insertion in the presence of CP was considered ineffective CP, whereas unsuccessful insertion was considered effective CP. The applied cricoid forces were measured with a novel instrument, the cricometer. The first patient in each group received 20 N. The applied cricoid force in successive patients was determined by the response of the previous patient within the same group, using the up-and-down sequential allocation technique. RESULTS: In the 30 men and 30 women who qualified for the study, the median cricoid force (cricoid force = 50) that occluded the esophageal entrance was 30.8 N (95% confidence interval = 28.15–33.5) in men, and 18.7 N in women (95% confidence interval = 17.1–20.3; P < .0001). Patency of the esophageal entrance was observed when CP was not applied and when inadequate forces that allowed successful esophageal cannulation were used. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides evidenceAbstract : BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis whether gender differences exist in the applied cricoid force necessary to prevent regurgitation. Real-time visual and dynamic means were used to assess the effectiveness of different applied cricoid forces in occluding the esophageal entrance in men (group 1) and in women (group 2). METHODS: In anesthetized and paralyzed patients, the glottis and esophageal entrance were visualized with a Glidescope video laryngoscope. Trained operators performed cricoid pressure (CP) and gastric tube insertion trials. Successful gastric tube insertion in the presence of CP was considered ineffective CP, whereas unsuccessful insertion was considered effective CP. The applied cricoid forces were measured with a novel instrument, the cricometer. The first patient in each group received 20 N. The applied cricoid force in successive patients was determined by the response of the previous patient within the same group, using the up-and-down sequential allocation technique. RESULTS: In the 30 men and 30 women who qualified for the study, the median cricoid force (cricoid force = 50) that occluded the esophageal entrance was 30.8 N (95% confidence interval = 28.15–33.5) in men, and 18.7 N in women (95% confidence interval = 17.1–20.3; P < .0001). Patency of the esophageal entrance was observed when CP was not applied and when inadequate forces that allowed successful esophageal cannulation were used. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides evidence that the median force necessary to occlude the esophageal entrance to prevent regurgitation is less in women compared with men. Applying the appropriate cricoid force in women should also decrease airway-related problems that tend to occur with the use of excessive forces. The findings of the current study may only be applicable to patients with normal body habitus. Abstract : Published ahead of print January 10, 2017. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Anesthesia & analgesia. Volume 124:Number 4(2017)
- Journal:
- Anesthesia & analgesia
- Issue:
- Volume 124:Number 4(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 124, Issue 4 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 124
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0124-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-04
- Subjects:
- Anesthesiology -- Periodicals
Anesthesia
Anesthesiology
Analgesia
Analgesics
Anesthesiology -- Periodicals
617.9605 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00000539-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001631 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-2999
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0900.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8031.xml