A Complication Analysis of 2 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prosthetic-based Breast Reconstruction. Issue 7 (July 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Complication Analysis of 2 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prosthetic-based Breast Reconstruction. Issue 7 (July 2016)
- Main Title:
- A Complication Analysis of 2 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prosthetic-based Breast Reconstruction
- Authors:
- Keifer, Orion P.
Page, Eugenia K.
Hart, Alexandra
Rudderman, Randall
Carlson, Grant W.
Losken, Albert - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Acellular dermal matrices (ADM) are now routine in postmastectomy prosthetic-based breast reconstruction. The goal of the current study was to compare the complications of 2 ADM products—AlloDerm and Cortiva. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prosthetic-based breast reconstruction in Atlanta, Ga., over 5 years. Inclusion criteria were the use of the ADM types (AlloDerm or Cortiva) and use of a tissue expander or implant. Statistical analysis compared group demographics, risk factors, and early complications. Results: Of the 298 breast reconstructions, 174 (58.4%) used AlloDerm and 124 (41.6%) used Cortiva. There was no difference in overall complication frequency (16 AlloDerm and 18 Cortiva; P = 0.195). Within specific categories, there was a difference in mastectomy skin flap necrosis, but, based on further regression analysis, this was attributable to differences in body mass index ( P = 0.036). Furthermore, there were no differences in the rates of infection (6 AlloDerm and 5 Cortiva; P = 1.0), seroma/hematoma (9 AlloDerm and 7 Cortiva; P = 1.0), or drain duration (13.2 day AlloDerm and 14.2 day Cortiva, P = 0.2). By using a general estimating equation for binomial logistical regression, it was found that only current tobacco use ( P = 0.033) was a significant predictor for a complication. Trending predictors were body mass index ( P = 0.074) and age ( P = 0.093). The type of matrix was not a significant predictor for any of the recordedAbstract : Background: Acellular dermal matrices (ADM) are now routine in postmastectomy prosthetic-based breast reconstruction. The goal of the current study was to compare the complications of 2 ADM products—AlloDerm and Cortiva. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prosthetic-based breast reconstruction in Atlanta, Ga., over 5 years. Inclusion criteria were the use of the ADM types (AlloDerm or Cortiva) and use of a tissue expander or implant. Statistical analysis compared group demographics, risk factors, and early complications. Results: Of the 298 breast reconstructions, 174 (58.4%) used AlloDerm and 124 (41.6%) used Cortiva. There was no difference in overall complication frequency (16 AlloDerm and 18 Cortiva; P = 0.195). Within specific categories, there was a difference in mastectomy skin flap necrosis, but, based on further regression analysis, this was attributable to differences in body mass index ( P = 0.036). Furthermore, there were no differences in the rates of infection (6 AlloDerm and 5 Cortiva; P = 1.0), seroma/hematoma (9 AlloDerm and 7 Cortiva; P = 1.0), or drain duration (13.2 day AlloDerm and 14.2 day Cortiva, P = 0.2). By using a general estimating equation for binomial logistical regression, it was found that only current tobacco use ( P = 0.033) was a significant predictor for a complication. Trending predictors were body mass index ( P = 0.074) and age ( P = 0.093). The type of matrix was not a significant predictor for any of the recorded complication ( P = 0.160). Conclusions: Although AlloDerm is well established, we have shown that Cortiva has an equivalent complication frequency. Future work will focus on long-term outcome measures and histological evaluation of vascularization and integration. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 4:Issue 7(2016:Jul.)
- Journal:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 4:Issue 7(2016:Jul.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 7 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0004-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-07
- Subjects:
- Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
617.95205 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000790 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2169-7574
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8040.xml