Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia?. Issue 4 (23rd March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Suwa, Katsuhito; Okamoto, Tomoyoshi; Yanaga, Katsuhiko
• Is Part Of: Asian journal of endoscopic surgery. Volume 11:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 378
• Page End: 384
• Publication Date: 2018-03-23
• Subjects: IPOM‐Plus -- laparoscopic repair -- large incisional hernia; Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Endoscopic surgery -- Asia -- Periodicals; 617.05705
• DOI: 10.1111/ases.12471
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1758-5902

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The ideal surgical technique for large incisional hernia repair has not yet been identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes of standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh (sIPOM) versus fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM‐Plus) for large incisional hernia repair. Methods: Of 49 patients who underwent laparoscopic incisional hernia repair between November 2005 and December 2016, 26 cases with large incisional hernia (transverse diameter ≥10 cm) were examined to compare surgical outcomes between sIPOM ( n = 12) and IPOM‐Plus ( n = 14). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U ‐test and Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: We compared sIPOM with IPOM‐Plus for similar hernia types during median follow‐up periods of 53 and 21 months, respectively. The operation time was 150 min for sIPOM and 148 min for IPOM‐Plus ( P = 0.6220). Early postoperative complications including seroma formation were observed in four sIPOM patients (33%) and three IPOM‐Plus patients (21%) ( P = 0.6652). Significantly more mesh bulged with sIPOM than with IPOM‐Plus (50% vs 0%; P = 0.0082). Chronic pain lasting 3 months after the operation was found in two cases of IPOM‐Plus (14%), but this was not statistically significant. Postoperative hospital stay was longer for sIPOM patients than for IPOM‐Plus patients. Only one recurrence was observed in the sIPOM group (8%), but this was not statistically significant. Conclusion: For large incisional hernia repair, IPOM‐Plus seems to be more effective than sIPOM in terms of reducing mesh bulging.