Achillon versus open surgery in acute Achilles tendon repair. Issue 5 (October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alcelik, Ilhan; Saeed, Zubair M.; Haughton, Ben A.; Shahid, Rizwan; Alcelik, John C.; Brogden, Craig; Budgen, Adam
• Is Part Of: Foot and ankle surgery. Volume 24:Issue 5(2018)
• Page Start: 427
• Page End: 434
• Publication Date: 2018-10
• Subjects: Achilles tendon rupture -- Achillon -- Open repair -- Minimally invasive technique -- Complication rate; Foot -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- surgery -- Periodicals; Foot -- surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Surgery; Foot -- Surgery; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 617.58
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.04.016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1268-7731

Abstract

Highlights: Complications following surgery are significantly reduced in the Achillon repairs. Re-rupture rates are similar between the two groups. No sural nerve injuries occurred with Achillon repairs. Achillon repairs is favourable technique for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Abstract: Background: Open Achilles tendon repairs (OATR) are associated with high complication rates. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques like the Achillon Achilles tendon repair (AATR) were developed to reduce this. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare OATR with AATR. Methods: We performed an extensive literature search including all studies that compared the two techniques. Outcomes assessed included overall complication rate, re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, wound length, The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Scores (AOFAS) scores and return to sports. Results: Eight studies were suitable for inclusion totalling 210 patients in the AATR group vs 233 patients in the OATR group. Total complication rates were significantly reduced in the Achillon patients with odd ratio of 0.14 (CI 95%, 0.08–0.27, P < 0.00001) in favour. There were no significant differences in re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, return to sports and AOFAS scores following repair between the two groups. Conclusions: AATR has fewer overall complications compared with OATR. It should be considered as an alternative to open surgical repair.