Evaluation of a new multiplex PCR assay (ParaGENIE G-Amoeba Real-Time PCR kit) targeting Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar/Entamoeba moshkovskii from stool specimens: evidence for the limited performances of microscopy-based approach for amoeba species identification. (November 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluation of a new multiplex PCR assay (ParaGENIE G-Amoeba Real-Time PCR kit) targeting Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar/Entamoeba moshkovskii from stool specimens: evidence for the limited performances of microscopy-based approach for amoeba species identification. (November 2018)
- Main Title:
- Evaluation of a new multiplex PCR assay (ParaGENIE G-Amoeba Real-Time PCR kit) targeting Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar/Entamoeba moshkovskii from stool specimens: evidence for the limited performances of microscopy-based approach for amoeba species identification
- Authors:
- Morio, F.
Valot, S.
Laude, A.
Desoubeaux, G.
Argy, N.
Nourrisson, C.
Pomares, C.
Machouart, M.
Le Govic, Y.
Dalle, F.
Botterel, F.
Bourgeois, N.
Cateau, E.
Leterrier, M.
Jeddi, F.
Gaboyard, M.
Le Pape, P. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: Besides the potential to identify a wide variety of gastrointestinal parasites, microscopy remains the reference standard in clinical microbiology for amoeba species identification and, especially when coupled with adhesin detection, to discriminate the pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica from its sister but non-pathogenic species Entamoeba dispar / Entamoeba moshkovskii . However, this approach is time-consuming, requires a high-level of expertise that can be jeopardized considering the low prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in non-endemic countries. Here, we evaluated the CE-IVD-marked multiplex PCR (ParaGENIE G-Amoeba, Ademtech) targeting E. histolytica and E. dispar / E. moshkovskii and Giardia intestinalis . Methods: This evaluation was performed blindly on a reference panel of 172 clinical stool samples collected prospectively from 12 laboratories and analysed using a standardized protocol relying on microscopy (and adhesin detection by ELISA for the detection of E. histolytica ) including G. intestinalis ( n = 37), various amoeba species ( n = 55) including E. dispar ( n = 15), E. histolytica ( n = 5), as well as 17 other gastrointestinal parasites ( n = 80), and negative samples ( n = 37). Results: This new multiplex PCR assay offers fast and reliable results with appropriate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of G. intestinalis and E. dispar / E. moshkovskii from stools (89.7%/96.9% and 95%/100%, respectively). DetectionAbstract: Objectives: Besides the potential to identify a wide variety of gastrointestinal parasites, microscopy remains the reference standard in clinical microbiology for amoeba species identification and, especially when coupled with adhesin detection, to discriminate the pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica from its sister but non-pathogenic species Entamoeba dispar / Entamoeba moshkovskii . However, this approach is time-consuming, requires a high-level of expertise that can be jeopardized considering the low prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in non-endemic countries. Here, we evaluated the CE-IVD-marked multiplex PCR (ParaGENIE G-Amoeba, Ademtech) targeting E. histolytica and E. dispar / E. moshkovskii and Giardia intestinalis . Methods: This evaluation was performed blindly on a reference panel of 172 clinical stool samples collected prospectively from 12 laboratories and analysed using a standardized protocol relying on microscopy (and adhesin detection by ELISA for the detection of E. histolytica ) including G. intestinalis ( n = 37), various amoeba species ( n = 55) including E. dispar ( n = 15), E. histolytica ( n = 5), as well as 17 other gastrointestinal parasites ( n = 80), and negative samples ( n = 37). Results: This new multiplex PCR assay offers fast and reliable results with appropriate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of G. intestinalis and E. dispar / E. moshkovskii from stools (89.7%/96.9% and 95%/100%, respectively). Detection rate and specificity were greatly improved by the PCR assay, highlighting several samples misidentified by microscopy, including false-negative and false-positive results for both E. dispar/E. moshkovskii and E. histolytica . Conclusion: Given the clinical relevance of amoeba species identification, microbiologists should be aware of the limitations of using an algorithm relying on microscopy coupled with adhesin detection by ELISA. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical microbiology and infection. Volume 24:Number 11(2018)
- Journal:
- Clinical microbiology and infection
- Issue:
- Volume 24:Number 11(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 24, Issue 11 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0024-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 1205
- Page End:
- 1209
- Publication Date:
- 2018-11
- Subjects:
- Entamoeba dispar/Entamoeba moshkovskii -- Entamoeba histolytica -- Giardia intestinalis -- Microscopy -- Multiplex PCR -- Stool
Medical microbiology -- Periodicals
Diagnostic microbiology -- Periodicals
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
616.01 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-0691 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.007 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1198-743X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.305520
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7998.xml