Non‐pharmacological interventions for non‐respiratory sleep disturbance in children with neurodisabilities: a systematic review. (29th July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Scantlebury, Arabella; Mcdaid, Catriona; Dawson, Vicki; Elphick, Heather; Fairhurst, Caroline; Hewitt, Catherine; Parker, Adwoa; Spiers, Gemma; Thomas, Megan; Wright, Kath; Beresford, Bryony
• Is Part Of: Developmental medicine & child neurology. Volume 60:Number 11(2018)
• Page Start: 1076
• Page End: 1092
• Publication Date: 2018-07-29
• Subjects: Child development -- Periodicals; Pediatric neurology -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13972
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-1622

Abstract

Abstract : Aim: To describe existing evidence on non‐pharmacological interventions to manage sleep disturbance in children with neurodisabilities. Method: We systematically reviewed non‐pharmacological interventions aimed at improving non‐respiratory sleep disturbance in children with neurodisability. Sixteen databases, grey literature, and reference lists of included papers were searched up to February 2017. Two researchers (B.B., C.M., G.S., A.S., A.P.) undertook screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal. Results: Twenty‐five studies were included: 11 randomized controlled trials and 14 before‐and‐after studies. All studies were at high or unclear risk of bias. Parent‐directed interventions were categorized as comprehensive tailored interventions ( n =9), comprehensive non‐tailored interventions ( n =8), and non‐comprehensive interventions ( n =2). Six 'other' non‐pharmacological interventions were included. Seventy‐one child and parent sleep‐related outcomes were measured across the included studies. We report the two most commonly measured outcomes: the Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire and sleep onset latency. Five studies reported significant improvements on at least one of these outcomes. Interpretation: Various types of non‐pharmacological intervention for managing sleep disturbance have been evaluated. Clinical heterogeneity and poor study quality meant we could not draw definitive conclusions on the effectiveness of these interventions. Current clinical guidance recommends parent‐directed interventions as the first approach to managing sleep disturbance; prioritizing research in this area is recommended. What this paper adds: Existing evidence on non‐pharmacological interventions to manage sleep disturbance in children with neurodisabilities is predominately of poor quality. Most included studies evaluated parent‐directed interventions of varying content and intensity. There was very little consistency between studies in the outcome measures used. There is some evidence that parent‐directed interventions may improve child outcomes. What this paper adds: Existing evidence on non‐pharmacological interventions to manage sleep disturbance in children with neurodisabilities is predominately of poor quality. Most included studies evaluated parent‐directed interventions of varying content and intensity. There was very little consistency between studies in the outcome measures used. There is some evidence that parent‐directed interventions may improve child outcomes. This article's abstract has been translated into Spanish and Portuguese. Follow the links from theabstract to view the translations.