A systematic review of different substance injection and dry needling for treatment of temporomandibular myofascial pain. Issue 11 (November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Machado, E.; Machado, P.; Wandscher, V.F.; Marchionatti, A.M.E.; Zanatta, F.B.; Kaizer, O.B.
• Is Part Of: International journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. Volume 47:Issue 11(2018:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1420
• Page End: 1432
• Publication Date: 2018-11
• Subjects: myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome -- temporomandibular joint disorders -- local anaesthetics -- botulinum toxins -- dry needling; Mouth -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Dentistry, Operative; Oral Surgical Procedures; Surgery, Oral; Dentistry; Maxilla -- Surgery; Mouth -- Surgery; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 617.52059
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.05.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0901-5027

Abstract

Abstract: Temporomandibular myofascial pain presents a major challenge in the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Due to the characteristics of this condition, intramuscular injection procedures are often needed for adequate control of symptoms and treatment. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling and injection with different substances in temporomandibular myofascial pain. Electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL/Cochrane, Lilacs, Scopus, Web of Science and CAPES Catalog of Dissertations and Theses were searched for randomized clinical trials until January 2018. Manual search was performed in relevant journals and in the references/citations of the included studies. The selection of studies was carried out by two independent reviewers according to eligibility criteria. From 7128 eligible studies, 137 were selected for full-text analysis and 18 were included. Due to the heterogeneity of the primary studies it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis. The narrative analysis of the results showed that most of the studies had methodological limitations and biases that compromised the quality of the findings. Dry needling and local anaesthesic injections seem promising, but there is a need to conduct further randomized clinical trials, with larger samples and longer follow-up times, to evaluate the real effectiveness of the technique and evaluated substances.