Pro-poor? Inclusion and exclusion in native potato value chains in the central highlands of Peru. (August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tobin, Daniel; Glenna, Leland; Devaux, Andre
• Is Part Of: Journal of rural studies. Volume 46(2016)
• Page Start: 71
• Page End: 80
• Publication Date: 2016-08
• Subjects: Value chain -- Pro-poor -- Social inclusion -- Social stratification -- Native potatoes -- Peru; Sociology, Rural -- Periodicals; Country life -- Periodicals; Rural development -- Periodicals; Land use, Rural -- Planning -- Periodicals; Rural conditions -- Periodicals; Sociologie rurale -- Périodiques; Vie rurale -- Périodiques; Développement rural -- Périodiques; Sol, Utilisation agricole du -- Planification -- Périodiques; Conditions rurales -- Périodiques; Country life; Land use, Rural -- Planning; Rural conditions; Rural development; Sociology, Rural; Periodicals; 307.72
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0743-0167

Abstract

Abstract: Including smallholding farmers in high value markets has emerged as a pro-poor development strategy. Through a case study of a project that intended to incorporate native potato growers in the central Peruvian highlands into corporate potato chip value chains, this study investigates social differentiation among participants and nonparticipants, as well as reasons for households' inclusion or exclusion. Household surveys and semi-structured interviews in one of the communities where the project was implemented provided the data. Results suggest that value chain participants generally have higher economic status and actively exclude lower-resource households in the community. However, non-participation is not necessarily viewed negatively by all non-participating households. Some deliberately choose not to participate to pursue other livelihood strategies or because of risks involved in participating. These findings indicate that participation in value chains is not necessarily beneficial. For such programs to have broad social benefits, policies and other institutional arrangements are needed to minimize risks of participation in such value chains and to provide support for other market outlets. Highlights: Smallholder inclusion and exclusion in potato value chain is explored. Higher-resource households sell their potatoes in value chains more commonly. Value chains contribute to social stratification at the local level. Some households actively opt out of value chains. Exclusion from value chains is not absolutely negative.