Concurrent Monte Carlo transport and fluence optimization with fluence adjusting scalable transport Monte Carlo. Issue 6 (23rd May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Y. M.; Svatos, M.; Zankowski, C.; Bednarz, B.
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 43:Issue 6(2016)Part 1
• Page Start: 3034
• Page End: 3048
• Publication Date: 2016-05-23
• Subjects: dosimetry -- inverse problems -- Monte Carlo methods -- optimisation -- phantoms -- radiation therapy -- stochastic processes; Applications -- Numerical optimization -- Applications of Monte Carlo methods -- Monte Carlo simulations -- Stochastic modeling -- Dose‐volume analysis; Radiation therapy -- Scintigraphy; concurrent optimization -- Monte Carlo -- fluence optimization -- optimization concurrent Monte Carlo optimization; Monte Carlo methods -- Dosimetry -- Optimization -- Renormalization -- Medical treatment planning -- Stochastic processes -- Drug delivery -- Numerical solutions -- Radiation treatment; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1118/1.4950711
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The future of radiation therapy will require advanced inverse planning solutions to support single‐arc, multiple‐arc, and "4 π " delivery modes, which present unique challenges in finding an optimal treatment plan over a vast search space, while still preserving dosimetric accuracy. The successful clinical implementation of such methods would benefit from Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculation methods, which can offer improvements in dosimetric accuracy when compared to deterministic methods. The standard method for MC based treatment planning optimization leverages the accuracy of the MC dose calculation and efficiency of well‐developed optimization methods, by precalculating the fluence to dose relationship within a patient with MC methods and subsequently optimizing the fluence weights. However, the sequential nature of this implementation is computationally time consuming and memory intensive. Methods to reduce the overhead of the MC precalculation have been explored in the past, demonstrating promising reductions of computational time overhead, but with limited impact on the memory overhead due to the sequential nature of the dose calculation and fluence optimization. The authors propose an entirely new form of "concurrent" Monte Carlo treat plan optimization: a platform which optimizes the fluence during the dose calculation, reduces wasted computation time being spent on beamlets that weakly contribute to the final dose distribution, and requires only a low memory footprint to function. In this initial investigation, the authors explore the key theoretical and practical considerations of optimizing fluence in such a manner. Methods: The authors present a novel derivation and implementation of a gradient descent algorithm that allows for optimization during MC particle transport, based on highly stochastic information generated through particle transport of very few histories. A gradient rescaling and renormalization algorithm, and the concept of momentum from stochastic gradient descent were used to address obstacles unique to performing gradient descent fluence optimization during MC particle transport. The authors have applied their method to two simple geometrical phantoms, and one clinical patient geometry to examine the capability of this platform to generate conformal plans as well as assess its computational scaling and efficiency, respectively. Results: The authors obtain a reduction of at least 50% in total histories transported in their investigation compared to a theoretical unweighted beamlet calculation and subsequent fluence optimization method, and observe a roughly fixed optimization time overhead consisting of ∼10% of the total computation time in all cases. Finally, the authors demonstrate a negligible increase in memory overhead of ∼7–8 MB to allow for optimization of a clinical patient geometry surrounded by 36 beams using their platform. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a fluence optimization approach, which could significantly improve the development of next generation radiation therapy solutions while incurring minimal additional computational overhead.