Accuracy of Zero-Heat-Flux Cutaneous Temperature in Intensive Care Adults. Issue 7 (July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dahyot-Fizelier, Claire; Lamarche, Solène; Kerforne, Thomas; Bénard, Thierry; Giraud, Benoit; Bellier, Rémy; Carise, Elsa; Frasca, Denis; Mimoz, Olivier
• Is Part Of: Critical care medicine. Volume 45:Issue 7(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-07
• Subjects: core temperature -- esophageal temperature -- intensive care -- surface temperature -- zero-heat-flux method; Critical care medicine -- Periodicals; Soins intensifs -- Périodiques; 616.028
• DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002317
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0090-3493

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To compare accuracy of a continuous noninvasive cutaneous temperature using zero-heat-flux method to esophageal temperature and arterial temperature. Design: Prospective study. Setting: ICU and NeuroICU, University Hospital. Patients: Fifty-two ICU patients over a 4-month period who required continuous temperature monitoring were included in the study, after informed consent. Interventions: All patients had esophageal temperature probe and a noninvasive cutaneous device to monitor their core temperature continuously. In seven patients who required cardiac output monitoring, continuous iliac arterial temperature was collected. Simultaneous core temperatures were recorded from 1 to 5 days. Comparison to the esophageal temperature, considered as the reference in this study, used the Bland and Altman method with adjustment for multiple measurements per patient. Measurements and Main Results: The esophageal temperature ranged from 33°C to 39.7°C, 61, 298 pairs of temperature using zero-heat-flux and esophageal temperature were collected and 1, 850 triple of temperature using zero-heat-flux, esophageal temperature, and arterial temperature. Bias and limits of agreement for temperature using zero-heat-flux were 0.19°C ± 0.53°C compared with esophageal temperature with an absolute difference of temperature pairs equal to or lower than 0.5°C of 92.6% (95% CI, 91.9–93.4%) of cases and equal to or lower than 1°C for 99.9% (95% CI, 99.7–100.0%) of cases. Compared with arterial temperature, bias and limits of agreement were –0.00°C ± 0.36°C with an absolute difference of temperature pairs equal to or lower than 0.5°C of 99.8% (95% CI, 95.3–100%) of cases. All absolute difference of temperature pairs between temperature using zero-heat-flux and arterial temperature and between arterial temperature and esophageal temperature were equal to or lower than 1°C. No local or systemic serious complication was observed. Conclusions: These results suggest a comparable reliability of the cutaneous sensor using the zero-heat-flux method compared with esophageal or iliac arterial temperatures measurements. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.