Influence of Hydroxyapatite Stick on Pedicle Screw Fixation in Degenerative Lumbar Spine: Biomechanical and Radiologic Study. Issue 6 (July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shin, Sung Joon; Lee, Ji-Ho; Lee, Jae Hyup
• Is Part Of: Clinical spine surgery. Volume 30:Issue 6(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-07
• Subjects: bone screws -- torque -- osteoporosis -- hydroxyapatites; Spinal cord -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Spinal cord -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.56059
• DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000405
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2380-0186

Abstract

Abstract : Study Design: A prospective, within-patient, left-right comparative study. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of hydroxyapatite (HA) stick augmentation method by comparing the insertional torque of the pedicle screw in osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic patients. Summary of Background Data: Unsatisfactory clinical outcomes after spine surgery in osteoporotic patients are related to pedicle screw loosening or pull-outs. HA, as a bone graft extender, has a possibility to enhance the fixation strength at the bone-screw interface. Methods: From November 2009 to December 2010, among patients who required bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar spine surgery, 22 patients were enrolled, who recieved unilateral HA stick augmentation and completed intraoperative insertional torque measurement of each pedicle screws. On the basis of preoperative evaluation of bone mineral density, patients with osteoporosis had 2 HA sticks inserted unilaterally, and 1 stick for patients without osteoporosis. Pedicle screw loosening and pull-outs were assessed using 12-month postoperative CT scans and follow-up radiographs. Clinical evaluation was done preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively, based on Visual Analog Scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-36 Health Survey. Results: Regardless of bone mineral density, the average torque value of all pedicle screws with HA stick insertion (HA stick inserted group) was significantly higher than that of all pedicle screws without HA insertion (control group) ( P <0.0001). Same results were seen in the HA stick inserted subgroups and the control subgroups within both of the osteoporosis group ( P =0.009) and the nonosteoporosis group ( P =0.0004). There was no statistically significant difference of the rate of pedicle screw loosening in between the HA stick inserted group and the control group. Clinical evaluation also showed no statistically significant difference in between patients with loosening and those without. Conclusions: The enhancement of initial pedicle screw fixation strength in osteoporotic patients can be achieved by HA stick augmentation.