A randomized trial of telemedicine efficacy and safety for nonacute headaches. (11th July 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A randomized trial of telemedicine efficacy and safety for nonacute headaches. (11th July 2017)
- Main Title:
- A randomized trial of telemedicine efficacy and safety for nonacute headaches
- Authors:
- Müller, Kai I.
Alstadhaug, Karl B.
Bekkelund, Svein I. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To evaluate long-term treatment efficacy and safety of one-time telemedicine consultations for nonacute headaches. Methods: We randomized, allocated, and consulted nonacute headache patients via telemedicine (n = 200) or in a traditional manner (n = 202) in a noninferiority trial. Efficacy endpoints, assessed by questionnaires at 3 and 12 months, included change from baseline in Headache Impact Test–6 (HIT-6) (primary endpoint) and pain intensity (visual analogue scale [VAS]) (secondary endpoint). The primary safety endpoint, assessed via patient records, was presence of secondary headache within 12 months after consultation. Results: We found no differences between telemedicine and traditional consultations in HIT-6 ( p = 0.84) or VAS ( p = 0.64) over 3 periods. The absolute difference in HIT-6 from baseline was 0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] −1.26 to 1.82, p = 0.72) at 3 months and 0.2 (95% CI −1.98 to 1.58, p = 0.83) at 12 months. The absolute change in VAS was 0.4 (95% CI −0.93 to 0.22, p = 0.23) after 3 months and 0.3 (95% CI −0.94 to 0.29, p = 0.30) at 12 months. We found one secondary headache in each group at 12 months. The estimated number of consultations needed to miss one secondary headache with the use of telemedicine was 20, 200. Conclusion: Telemedicine consultation for nonacute headache is as efficient and safe as a traditional consultation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02270177. Classification of evidence: This study providesAbstract : Objective: To evaluate long-term treatment efficacy and safety of one-time telemedicine consultations for nonacute headaches. Methods: We randomized, allocated, and consulted nonacute headache patients via telemedicine (n = 200) or in a traditional manner (n = 202) in a noninferiority trial. Efficacy endpoints, assessed by questionnaires at 3 and 12 months, included change from baseline in Headache Impact Test–6 (HIT-6) (primary endpoint) and pain intensity (visual analogue scale [VAS]) (secondary endpoint). The primary safety endpoint, assessed via patient records, was presence of secondary headache within 12 months after consultation. Results: We found no differences between telemedicine and traditional consultations in HIT-6 ( p = 0.84) or VAS ( p = 0.64) over 3 periods. The absolute difference in HIT-6 from baseline was 0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] −1.26 to 1.82, p = 0.72) at 3 months and 0.2 (95% CI −1.98 to 1.58, p = 0.83) at 12 months. The absolute change in VAS was 0.4 (95% CI −0.93 to 0.22, p = 0.23) after 3 months and 0.3 (95% CI −0.94 to 0.29, p = 0.30) at 12 months. We found one secondary headache in each group at 12 months. The estimated number of consultations needed to miss one secondary headache with the use of telemedicine was 20, 200. Conclusion: Telemedicine consultation for nonacute headache is as efficient and safe as a traditional consultation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02270177. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that a one-time telemedicine consultation for nonacute headache is noninferior to a one-time traditional consultation regarding long-term treatment outcome and safety. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neurology. Volume 89:Number 2(2017)
- Journal:
- Neurology
- Issue:
- Volume 89:Number 2(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 89, Issue 2 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 89
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0089-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-07-11
- Subjects:
- Neurology -- Periodicals
Neurology -- Periodicals
Neurologie -- Périodiques
616.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.mdconsult.com/public/search?search_type=journal&j_sort=pub_date&j_issn=0028-3878 ↗
http://www.mdconsult.com/about/journallist/192093418-5/about0nz0.html ↗
http://www.neurology.org ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004085 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0028-3878
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7920.xml