Pattern changes in step count accumulation and peak cadence due to a physical activity intervention. Issue 3 (March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barreira, T.V.; Harrington, D.M.; Schuna, J.M.; Tudor-Locke, C.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.
• Is Part Of: Journal of science and medicine in sport. Volume 19:Issue 3(2016:Mar.)
• Page Start: 227
• Page End: 231
• Publication Date: 2016-03
• Subjects: Peak cadence -- Physical activity guidelines -- Walking -- Activity counts; Sports sciences -- Periodicals; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sports -- physiology -- Periodicals; Sports Medicine -- Periodicals; Sportgeneeskunde; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.01.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1440-2440

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The purpose was to determine if a 12-week weight loss intervention with a physical activity (PA) component would lead to changes in steps/day, step count accumulation patterns, and peak cadence. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Methods: Overall, 121 overweight/obese White and African-American adults (ages 35–64 yrs) were randomized to a diet education plus PA education and behavior change intervention group (DE + PA) or diet education and behavior change group (DE). The DE + PA intervention was designed to increase steps/day, and steps at moderate-to-vigorous intensity. The Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer was used to measure steps accumulated in different cadence bands (1–19, 20–39, 40–59, 60–79, 80–99, 100–119, 120+ steps/min), and peak 1-min, 30-min and 60-min cadence. Pre- to post-intervention changes in steps/day, step count within each cadence band, and peak cadences were compared within groups using paired sample t -test and between groups after adjustment for baseline values of the same variable using ANCOVA. Results: Ninety participants had valid data (44 in the DE + PA group). Change in steps/day was not significantly different between the groups. However, participants in the DE + PA group accumulated significantly more steps at post-intervention in the 80–99, 100–119, and 120+ cadence bands, all p < 0.02. The DE + PA group increased step counts accumulated within the 100–119 (463 ± 1092 vs 56 ± 546 step counts; p = 0.01) and 120+ (390 ± 999 vs 34 ± 321 step counts; p = 0.03) cadence bands, as well as peak 60-min cadence when compared to the DE group. Conclusions: Non-significant changes in steps/day following a PA intervention may mask changes in steps accumulated at moderate-to-vigorous intensity cadences.