Influence of the stem fixation scenario on load transfer in a hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a biomimetic stem. (May 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Influence of the stem fixation scenario on load transfer in a hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a biomimetic stem. (May 2015)
- Main Title:
- Influence of the stem fixation scenario on load transfer in a hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a biomimetic stem
- Authors:
- Caouette, C.
Bureau, M.N.
Vendittoli, P.-A.
Lavigne, M.
Nuño, N. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Finite element (FE) analysis is a widely used tool for extensive preclinical testing of orthopaedic implants such as hip resurfacing femoral components, including evaluation of different stem fixation scenarios (cementation vs osseointegration, etc.). Most FE models use surface-to-surface contact elements to model the load-bearing interfaces that connect bone, cement and implant and neglect the mechanical effects of phenomena such as residual stresses from bone cement curing. The objective of the current study is to evaluate and quantify the effect of different stem fixation scenarios and related phenomena such as residual stresses from bone cement curing. Four models of a previously clinically available implant (Durom) were used to model different stem fixation scenarios of a new biomimetic stem: a cemented stem, a frictional stem, a partially and completely bonded stem, with and without residual stresses from bone cement curing. For the frictional stem, stem–bone micromotions were increased from 0% to 61% of the available surface subjected to micromotions between 10 and 40 μm with the inclusion of residual stresses from bone cement curing. Bonding the stem, even partially, increased stress in the implant at the stem-head junction. Complete bonding of the stem decreased bone strain at step tip, at the cost of increased strain shielding when compared with the frictional stem and partially bonded stem. The increase of micromotions and changes in bone strainAbstract: Finite element (FE) analysis is a widely used tool for extensive preclinical testing of orthopaedic implants such as hip resurfacing femoral components, including evaluation of different stem fixation scenarios (cementation vs osseointegration, etc.). Most FE models use surface-to-surface contact elements to model the load-bearing interfaces that connect bone, cement and implant and neglect the mechanical effects of phenomena such as residual stresses from bone cement curing. The objective of the current study is to evaluate and quantify the effect of different stem fixation scenarios and related phenomena such as residual stresses from bone cement curing. Four models of a previously clinically available implant (Durom) were used to model different stem fixation scenarios of a new biomimetic stem: a cemented stem, a frictional stem, a partially and completely bonded stem, with and without residual stresses from bone cement curing. For the frictional stem, stem–bone micromotions were increased from 0% to 61% of the available surface subjected to micromotions between 10 and 40 μm with the inclusion of residual stresses from bone cement curing. Bonding the stem, even partially, increased stress in the implant at the stem-head junction. Complete bonding of the stem decreased bone strain at step tip, at the cost of increased strain shielding when compared with the frictional stem and partially bonded stem. The increase of micromotions and changes in bone strain highlighted the influence of interfacial conditions on load transfer, and the need for a better modeling method, one capable of assessing the effect of phenomena such as interdigitation and residual stresses from bone cement curing. Graphical abstract: Highlights: We use finite element modeling to evaluate hip resurfacing femoral implant fixation. We evaluate the effect of different cervical stem bonding scenarios. Contact elements for modeling of load–bearing interfaces have several limitations. Adding residual stresses from bone cement curing increases micromotions. Interfacial conditions and related phenomena influence load transfer to the bone. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. Volume 45(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
- Issue:
- Volume 45(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 45, Issue 2015 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 45
- Issue:
- 2015
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0045-2015-0000
- Page Start:
- 90
- Page End:
- 100
- Publication Date:
- 2015-05
- Subjects:
- Load-bearing interface -- Bone cement curing -- Hip resurfacing prosthesis -- Finite element analysis
Biomedical materials -- Periodicals
Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties -- Periodicals
Biomedical materials
Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties
Periodicals
Electronic journals
610.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17516161 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.01.015 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1751-6161
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5015.809000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7887.xml