A framework and indicators for evaluating policies for conservation and development: The case of wildlife management units in Mexico. Issue 63 (September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ortega-Argueta, Alejandro; González-Zamora, Arturo; Contreras-Hernández, Armando
• Is Part Of: Environmental science & policy. Issue 63(2016:Sep.)
• Page Start: 91
• Page End: 100
• Publication Date: 2016-09
• Subjects: Mainstreaming conservation -- Assessment -- Indicators of sustainability -- Adaptive management -- Social welfare; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Sciences de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Environmental policy; Environmental sciences; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.70561
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-9011

Abstract

Highlights: We analyzed the case of wildlife co-management units in Mexico (SUMA). The governance and program implementation, including benefits, are described. Directions are provided to develop an appropriate M&E framework of the SUMA. Forty indicators are proposed for management, decision-making and evaluation. Indicators address environmental, socioeconomic and administrative dimensions. Abstract: The Mexican government has an innovative policy model for biodiversity conservation and rural development that includes permissible use of wildlife within a System of Land Management Units (SUMA, by its Spanish acronym). This co-management approach has been successful in terms of landowner participation, since the SUMA currently covers 38.2 million hectares (nearly 20% of Mexican territory). However, after 18 years of implementation, there has been no comprehensive evaluation by which to assess its effectiveness at national level. This article introduces the SUMA policy, its implementation and outcomes, and proposes a framework for conducting institutional monitoring and evaluation within an adaptive co-management approach. Our methodology comprised analysis of the achievements and challenges reported through interviews with stakeholders, journals and grey literature, and a review of the SUMA Information System (SIS) and its decision-making information needs. As result we have developed a set of 40 environmental, social and economic indicators grouped into five distinct but complementary dimensions within a sustainability framework: (I) Biodiversity conservation, (II) Wildlife management, (III) Economics, (IV) Social welfare and (V) Administration. These indicators can be incorporated into the SIS in order to support program evaluation and strengthen decision-making. Our article provides specific pathways for developing policy-oriented evaluation systems for worldwide biodiversity and conservation initiatives.