Risk of solid organ transplant rejection following vaccination with seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in England: A self-controlled case-series. Issue 31 (30th June 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Risk of solid organ transplant rejection following vaccination with seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in England: A self-controlled case-series. Issue 31 (30th June 2016)
- Main Title:
- Risk of solid organ transplant rejection following vaccination with seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in England: A self-controlled case-series
- Authors:
- Dos Santos, Gaël
Haguinet, François
Cohet, Catherine
Webb, Dave
Logie, John
Ferreira, Germano L.C.
Rosillon, Dominique
Shinde, Vivek - Abstract:
- Highlights: We assessed the risk of SOT rejection after seasonal influenza vaccination. We applied a self-controlled case-series method in transplant recipients in England. The study period encompassed three consecutive influenza seasons. Seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine use appears to be safe in SOT recipients. The results support current vaccination recommendations for this risk group. Abstract: Background: Annual seasonal influenza vaccination is recommended for transplant recipients. No formal pharmacoepidemiology study has been published on the association between solid organ transplant (SOT) rejection and vaccination with seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIIVs). Methods: The risk of SOT (liver, kidney, lung, heart or pancreas) rejection after TIIV vaccination was assessed using a self-controlled case-series method (NCT01715792 ). SOT recipients in England with transplant rejection were selected from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked Hospital Episode Statistics inpatient data. The study period (September 2006 to August 2009) encompassed three consecutive influenza seasons. We calculated the relative incidence (RI) of SOT rejection between the 30- and 60-day post-vaccination risk periods and the control periods (any follow-up period excluding risk periods), using a Poisson regression model. Results: In seasons 2006/07, 2007/08, 2008/09 and pooled seasons, 132, 136, 168 and 375 subjects, respectively, experienced at least oneHighlights: We assessed the risk of SOT rejection after seasonal influenza vaccination. We applied a self-controlled case-series method in transplant recipients in England. The study period encompassed three consecutive influenza seasons. Seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine use appears to be safe in SOT recipients. The results support current vaccination recommendations for this risk group. Abstract: Background: Annual seasonal influenza vaccination is recommended for transplant recipients. No formal pharmacoepidemiology study has been published on the association between solid organ transplant (SOT) rejection and vaccination with seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIIVs). Methods: The risk of SOT (liver, kidney, lung, heart or pancreas) rejection after TIIV vaccination was assessed using a self-controlled case-series method (NCT01715792 ). SOT recipients in England with transplant rejection were selected from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked Hospital Episode Statistics inpatient data. The study period (September 2006 to August 2009) encompassed three consecutive influenza seasons. We calculated the relative incidence (RI) of SOT rejection between the 30- and 60-day post-vaccination risk periods and the control periods (any follow-up period excluding risk periods), using a Poisson regression model. Results: In seasons 2006/07, 2007/08, 2008/09 and pooled seasons, 132, 136, 168 and 375 subjects, respectively, experienced at least one transplant rejection; approximately half (45%–51%) of these subjects had received a TIIV. For season 2006/07, the RI of rejection of any organ, adjusted for time since transplantation, was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.24–2.28) and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.24–1.38) during the 30-day and 60-day risk periods, respectively. Corresponding RIs for season 2007/08 were 1.21 (95% CI: 0.55–2.64) and 1.31 (95% CI: 0.69–2.48); for season 2008/09, 0.99 (95% CI: 0.43–2.28) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.31–1.33); and for pooled seasons 1.01 (95% CI: 0.58–1.76) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.56–1.38). The results of a separate analysis of kidney rejections and analyses that took into account additional potential confounders were consistent with those of the main analyses, with 95% CIs including 1 and upper limits below 3. Conclusion: This study provides reassuring evidence of the safety profile of TIIVs in SOT recipients, thus supporting current recommendations to vaccinate this risk group annually. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Vaccine. Volume 34:Issue 31(2016)
- Journal:
- Vaccine
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Issue 31(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 31 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 31
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0034-0031-0000
- Page Start:
- 3598
- Page End:
- 3606
- Publication Date:
- 2016-06-30
- Subjects:
- CI confidence interval -- CPRD Clinical Practice Research Datalink -- GP general practitioner -- HES Hospital Episodes Statistics -- NHS National Health Service -- RI relative incidence -- SCCS self-controlled case-series -- SOT solid organ transplant -- TIIV trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine -- WHO World Health Organization
Influenza -- Vaccine -- Safety -- Transplant rejection -- Self-controlled case-series -- Pharmacoepidemiology
Vaccines -- Periodicals
615.372 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0264410X ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/0264410X ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0264410X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.016 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0264-410X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9138.628000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7862.xml