Public reporting and the quality of care of German nursing homes. Issue 10 (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Herr, Annika; Nguyen, Thu-Van; Schmitz, Hendrik
• Is Part Of: Health policy. Volume 120:Issue 10(2016)
• Page Start: 1162
• Page End: 1170
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: Public reporting -- Nursing homes -- Quality -- Long-term care -- Information; Medical education -- Periodicals; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Delivery of Health Care -- Periodicals; Education, Medical -- Periodicals; Health Education -- Periodicals; Health Planning -- Periodicals; Public Policy -- Periodicals; Enseignement médical -- Périodiques; Politique sanitaire -- Périodiques; Medical education; Medical policy; Periodicals; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 362.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0168-8510

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: Since 2009, German nursing homes have been evaluated regularly by an external institution with quality report cards published online. We follow recent debates and argue that most of the information in the report cards does not reliably measure quality of care. However, a subset of up to seven measures does. Do these measures that reflect "risk factors" improve over time? Method: Using a sample of more than 3000 German nursing homes with information on two waves, we assume that the introduction of public reporting is an exogenous institutional change and apply before–after-estimations to obtain estimates for the relation between public reporting and quality. Results: We find a significant improvement of the identified risk factors. Also, the two employed outcome quality indicators improve significantly. The improvements are driven by nursing homes with low quality in the first evaluation. Conclusion: To the extent that this can be interpreted as evidence that public reporting positively affects the (reported) quality in nursing homes, policy makers should carefully choose indicators reflecting care-sensitive quality.