Responses to the multitargeted MET/ALK/ROS1 inhibitor crizotinib and co-occurring mutations in lung adenocarcinomas with MET amplification or MET exon 14 skipping mutation. Issue 3 (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jorge, Susan E.; Schulman, Sol; Freed, Jason A.; VanderLaan, Paul A.; Rangachari, Deepa; Kobayashi, Susumu S.; Huberman, Mark S.; Costa, Daniel B.
• Is Part Of: Lung cancer. Volume 90:Issue 3(2015:Dec.)
• Page Start: 369
• Page End: 374
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: Mutation -- Lung cancer -- Adenocarcinoma -- MET -- Exon 14 -- Amplification -- PIK3CA -- ALK -- ROS1 -- Crizotinib -- Ceritinib; Lungs -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Lung Neoplasms -- Abstracts; Lung Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Poumons -- Cancer -- Périodiques; Lungs -- Cancer; Periodicals; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 616.99424
• DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.10.028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0169-5002

Abstract

Highlights: MET amplification and MET exon 14 skipping mutation happen in lung adenocarcinomas. These genomic changes predict for response to the MET/ALK/ROS1 inhibitor crizotinib. Co-occurrence of PIK3CA mutations should be evaluated as modifiers of response. Abstract: Introduction: Genomic aberrations involving ALK, ROS1 and MET can be driver oncogenes in lung adenocarcinomas. Identification of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with activity against these tumors and of preclinical systems to model response are warranted. Methods: We analyzed cases with lung adenocarcinomas for representative genomic aberrations, evaluated the response to the multitargeted MET/ALK/ROS1 crizotinib TKI in cases with MET aberrations and profiled lung cancer cell lines with the aforementioned genomic changes. Results: Lung cancer cell lines with ALK rearrangement, ROS1 rearrangement or MET amplification had expected in vitro responses to crizotinib and the ALK/ROS1 TKI ceritinib. However, a commercially-available cell line with MET exon 14 skipping mutation and co-occurring PIK3CA -p.Glu545Lys mutation did not respond to crizotinib; suggesting the latter abrogated response. 10% of MET exon 14 skipping mutation co-occurred with PIK3CA mutation in the TCGA cohort. Putative crizotinib-responsive somatic mutations ( ALK rearrangements, ROS1 rearrangements, high level MET amplification or MET exon 14 skipping mutations) were present in 10% of lung adenocarcinomas analyzed at our service and in 9.5% of the TCGA lung adenocarcinoma database. One patient each whose advanced tumors harbored high level MET amplification with wild-type PIK3CA or MET exon 14 skipping mutation with PIK3CA -p.Glu542Lys had significant responses to crizotinib; suggesting that PIK3CA co-mutation did not affect clinical response. Conclusions: Approximately 10% of lung adenocarcinomas harbor aberrations that are targetable using the approved multitargeted TKI crizotinib. MET exon 14 skipping mutation predicts for response to MET TKIs in human lung adenocarcinomas but co-occurrence of PIK3CA mutation needs to be better evaluated as a modifier of response to TKI therapy. MET TKIs should not be omitted from MET exon 14 skipping mutated tumors until further preclinical and clinical data can confirm or refute mechanisms of primary or acquired resistance to crizotinib and other MET TKIs in these recalcitrant cancers.