Identifying sites at risk from illicit metal detecting: from CRAVED to HOPPER. Issue 10 (26th November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Grove, Louise; Daubney, Adam; Booth, Alasdair
• Is Part Of: International journal of heritage studies. Volume 24:Issue 10(2018)
• Page Start: 1038
• Page End: 1052
• Publication Date: 2018-11-26
• Subjects: Heritage crime -- illicit metal detecting -- portable antiquities -- crime prevention -- archaeology; Civilization -- History -- Periodicals; Culture -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Historic preservation -- Periodicals; Cultural property -- Protection -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Periodicals; 363.69
• DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2018.1475408
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-7258

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Archaeological sites are at risk from acquisitive crime: this paper focuses in particular on illicit metal detecting. The effects of theft in this context are not merely financial, but have devastating impact on our knowledge and understanding of the site. Even where items are later recovered, we lose the vital clues about the precise context of an object. We therefore need to reduce the risk of theft occurring in the first place. This paper draws on case studies from England and presents a new methodology to assess which archaeological sites may be at risk from illicit metal detecting: 'HOPPER' identifies the characteristics of sites likely to be targeted by offenders looking for antiquities. In brief: History (a history of finds at the site); Open (the site has physical public access, and/or is documented in the public domain); Protection (protected status can act as a beacon for offenders); Publicity (site is known about or receiving new attention); Evasion (there are known ways to escape apprehension); and Repeat victimisation (The site has been a target before). The impact of HOPPER will be its use in the field to develop a pragmatic risk assessment applicable both in a local and international context.