A study of computational methods for wake structure and base pressure prediction of a generic SUV model with fixed and rotating wheels. (August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Forbes, David; Page, Gary; Passmore, Martin; Gaylard, Adrian
• Other Names: Passmore Martin guest-editor.; Howell Jeff guest-editor.; Dominy Robert guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Volume 231:Number 9(2017:Sep.)
• Page Start: 1222
• Page End: 1238
• Publication Date: 2017-08
• Subjects: Automotive -- vehicle aerodynamics -- simulation -- unsteady -- RANS -- DES -- Lattice–Boltzmann -- SUV -- rotating wheels -- moving ground; Mechanical engineering -- Congresses; Transportation engineering -- Congresses; 629.2
• DOI: 10.1177/0954407016685496
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0954-4070

Abstract

This study is an evaluation of the computational methods in reproducing experimental data for a generic sports utility vehicle (SUV) geometry and an assessment on the influence of fixed and rotating wheels for this geometry. Initially, comparisons are made in the wake structure and base pressures between several CFD codes and experimental data. It was shown that steady-state RANS methods are unsuitable for this geometry due to a large scale unsteadiness in the wake caused by separation at the sharp trailing edge and rear wheel wake interactions. unsteady RANS (URANS) offered no improvements in wake prediction despite a significant increase in computational cost. The detached-eddy simulation (DES) and Lattice–Boltzmann methods showed the best agreement with the experimental results in both the wake structure and base pressure, with LBM running in approximately a fifth of the time for DES. The study then continues by analysing the influence of rotating wheels and a moving ground plane over a fixed wheel and ground plane arrangement. The introduction of wheel rotation and a moving ground was shown to increase the base pressure and reduce the drag acting on the vehicle when compared to the fixed case. However, when compared to the experimental standoff case, variations in drag and lift coefficients were minimal but misleading, as significant variations to the surface pressures were present.